User talk:Effausername
Effausername, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Effausername! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 10 November 2018 (UTC) |
November 2018
[edit]Your recent editing history at Sweetener (album) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Fan4Life (talk) 14:53, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Caution
[edit]The Rolling Stone source calls it "pop bliss" thus acknowledging pop as a primary genre. But its only called hip hop "leaning" and not primarily hip hop. Thus it can be used as a source for pop but not hip hop. Hope that makes it clear. Please refrain from changing those genres again as it implies an edit war. Thanks.--NØ 20:04, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Congrats on finding the Rap-Up link. Thats a reliable source so hip hop can stay in the infobox. But please learn to WP:Assume good faith and have discussions on the article talk page (or elsewhere) instead of relentlessly pursuing an edit war and refusing to discuss. Wikipedia is not a place for the latter. Regards, NØ 15:10, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Ariana Grande
[edit]Your recent editing history at Ariana Grande shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Fan4Life (talk) 17:13, 20 November 2018 (UTC)