User talk:Efekamer

Welcome!

Hello, Efekamer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Mjroots (talk) 20:32, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Efekamer,

I think nearly every of your contributions is wrong. So all the Turkish Airlines flights from Istanbul-Atatürk you deleted are still bookable. I would call this vandalism. Pease STOP it. I am really tired of undoing all your contributions. Bad.taste.in.music (talk) 19:37, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And also, you keep adding airlines that do not serve this airport. US Airways DOES NOT and has no plans to fly to Istanbul in the future. Please stop your addition of incorrect info or you will be reported and blocked. Snoozlepet (talk) 08:04, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Efekamer, please note: 1. Use the User talk (discussion) and not the user page. 2. Sign your posts. 3. What you do is deleting most of the flights to German and other European airports (Sky airlines, Sunexpress, ...). On the other hand you are very creative with new destinations like Turkish Airlines to the US which do not exist. Another example: You wrote Lufthansa to fly from Düsseldorf to Istanbul Atatürk which they do not (there is a codeshare on turkish airlines flights). You change statistics of airports all around the world by using very high (and false) passenger statistics for flights to Istanbul without any reference. And because I do not think you do it in good faith, it is vandalism. Please stop it! Bad.taste.in.music (talk) 21:10, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You contuine to vandalize airport pages Jamie2k9 (talk) 00:33, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

It pains me to have to do this, but you are still removing material from articles without explanation, despite being warned not do do so and two previous blocks for the same offence. Your failure to leave an edit summary only leads to increased scrutiny of your editing, as this tactic is a common one used by vandals. Your editing has now become disruptive if not outright vandalism, hence the block. Mjroots (talk) 11:08, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. You may post any reply here for copying over to ANI. Mjroots (talk) 11:16, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is a potential to reduce this block to a finite term, and reading the guide to appealing blocks will help. The most important elements that you will need to show in an unblock request are:

that the block is no longer necessary to prevent damage or disruption
that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again, and you will make productive contributions instead

Either way, you will need to show proof that you understand the policies of Wikipedia. Note, although you will use an unblock request, I highly expect the outcome will be to reduce the length of time, which is a gigantic victory, considering. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:11, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you need to understand that editing Wikipedia articles is not like editing documents on your own computer. Right above the "save" button there is a 1 line box. This is where you put the "edit summary", ie the reason why you made the edit. There should be an edit summary all the time but it's especially important when removing information from an article. Other editors watching the page are not going to just assume that what you are removing is "not true". --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:10, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Efekamer, are you a Turkish speaker/reader? Please let us know if this or another language is your native language. Maybe if things are explained to you in a language you understand better than English you will understand the problem and how to address it, then we can look at an unblock. Your block is not a punishment, but it is necessary at the moment to prevent damage to Wikipedia. I'm sure your editing is in good faith here, but you need to understand a few things before you can return to editing. Mjroots (talk) 14:23, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]