User talk:Efe/Archive 27
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Efe. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 |
FutureSex/LoveSounds
Re the typo in the source, MOS:QUOTE says: "Trivial spelling or typographical errors should be silently corrected (for example, correct ommission to omission, harasssment to harassment)—unless the slip is textually important." I think techn to techno counts as a trivial error which isn't textually important, so I think a silent correction is better; the use of square-brackets strikes me as an unnecessary distraction.VoluntarySlave (talk) 21:06, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, i see. I've been too conventional. Thanks for the link and explanation. Please copyedit if there's more to be done. Again, thank you. --Efe (talk) 04:33, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 October 2011
- News and notes: Arabic Wikipedia gets video intros, Smithsonian gifts images, and WikiProject Conservatism scrutinized
- In the news: Why Wikipedia survives while others haven't; Wikipedia as an emerging social model; Jimbo speaks out
- WikiProject report: History in your neighborhood: WikiProject NRHP
- Featured content: Brazil's boom-time dreams of naval power: The ed17 explains the background to a new featured topic
"Party"'s release date
Please participate and help clear the confusion here. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 05:03, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- Mark, are you fine? We have not talked since long. May i know why you are diminishing your number of edits again? I hope you are not thinking of leaving Wikipedia again for another two years. It will be very sad if you do so. We all love your company here. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 04:57, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Been seriously busy in the Office, and my access to internet (cafes) has been drastically reduced. --Efe (talk) 14:21, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
- Ah okay. I hope you are at least fine. Don't worry. I have faith that things will begin looking brighter for you very soon. Take care Mark. May God bless you. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 15:35, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks Jivesh. I do edits intermittently, but if you can see my logs I've been doing admin works. hehe. --Efe (talk) 15:39, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
- You want to be an admin. OMG, it demands a lot to be that. I really don't see myself doing so. Lol. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 15:51, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
- Jivesh, Mark is an admin and so is Orane :) Novice7 (talk) 04:12, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
- You want to be an admin. OMG, it demands a lot to be that. I really don't see myself doing so. Lol. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 15:51, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks Jivesh. I do edits intermittently, but if you can see my logs I've been doing admin works. hehe. --Efe (talk) 15:39, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
- Ah okay. I hope you are at least fine. Don't worry. I have faith that things will begin looking brighter for you very soon. Take care Mark. May God bless you. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 15:35, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
- Been seriously busy in the Office, and my access to internet (cafes) has been drastically reduced. --Efe (talk) 14:21, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
- Lol. I did not know. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 11:22, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
- Hehe. --Efe (talk) 13:53, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 October 2011
- From the editors: A call for contributors
- Opinion essay: There is a deadline
- Interview: Contracting for the Foundation
- WikiProject report: Great WikiProject Logos
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion; request for amendment on Climate Change case
- Technology report: WMF launches coding challenge, WMDE starts hiring for major new project
re "Unexplained removal of notices"
Hi. With reference to this edit, your Edit Summary includes "Unexplained removal of notices." Historically, such behavior has been allowed by users on their own user talk pages (with archival recommended), and by extension by IP Addresses on the user talk pages associated with them; has that changed? Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 14:12, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info Jeff. I just thought the previous notices will serve as reference in escalating the level of warning to might-be abuses. But the if its allowed, then so be it. The IP keeps on reverting it anyway. Regards, Efe (talk) 14:17, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome. You may want to brush up on WP:OWNTALK. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 14:38, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link. --Efe (talk) 14:43, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome. You may want to brush up on WP:OWNTALK. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 14:38, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
CSD:U1
Thanks Mark! :D Novice7 (talk) 16:05, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Question
Can you please give your opinion about this? Thanks in advance. :) - Saulo Talk to Me 00:47, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done Saulo. Thanks for the invite. --Efe (talk) 10:36, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The monster under the rug
- Recent research: WikiSym; predicting editor survival; drug information found lacking; RfAs and trust; Wikipedia's search engine ranking justified
- News and notes: German Wikipedia continues image filter protest
- Discussion report: Proposal to return this section from hiatus is successful
- WikiProject report: 'In touch' with WikiProject Rugby union
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case stalls, request for clarification on Δ, discretionary sanctions streamlined
- Technology report: Wikipedia Zero announced; New Orleans successfully hacked
Please let us know what you think
My friend, as you know, Beyonce's new album 4 is being handled in a catastrophic way (i do not know if this is a correct word). Please voice your opinion here so that we can decide which format will suit "Party" that best. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 15:35, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 7 November2011
- Special report: A post-mortem on the Indian Education Program pilot
- Discussion report: Special report on the ArbCom Elections steering RfC
- WikiProject report: Booting up with WikiProject Computer Science
- Featured content: Slow week for Featured content
- Arbitration report: Δ saga returns to arbitration, while the Abortion case stalls for another week
Request
Hello Mark Anthony, Please request possible.
Is it possible to develop an article Singer of the High School Musical, Corbin Bleu and become a good article See the article Arabic Wikipedia good article, can you? .
Look at this version will help you to become a good article. I do not see any adjustment well in this article, can you make a good article as an article Biographies.
Success in your life. Goodbye Mark Anthony. --77.30.77.171 (talk) 14:17, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hi. Thank you for your interest. I will not promise, but I will try. As you can see, my edits have reduced radically due to real life commitments. But nonetheless, I will watch the article and make edits when I have time. Thank you and God bless you. --Efe (talk) 14:22, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- By the way, I don't know how to translate articles written in Arabic. Maybe I'll just do my own research. Thanks again. --Efe (talk) 14:24, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Thank you my friend for the coordination of the article well. You are the only co-format article for a long time.
By the way, you can translate the article Arabic translation of Google see in this link: http://translate.google.com/?hl=ar&tab=TT#
See in this version, See the sources, the sources are reliable and noted at the top of the article, does not have a template unreliable sources. Thank you my friend for your contribution in this article and its evolution, God bless you. Success in your life. --77.30.77.171 (talk) 17:50, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
You can format the article in the later. --77.30.77.171 (talk) 18:10, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- Restored what I think is a better version. We'll do some edits later. Thanks. --Efe (talk) 14:15, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Another discussion, this time regarding "Love on Top"
First of all, my sincere thanks for your participation in previous Beyonce-related discussion. I request you to please weigh your opinion here. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 06:38, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- Done. --Efe (talk) 15:18, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 15:25, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- Do you think this has a chance at FAC? ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 15:25, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- I think there is. It has not undergone GA review, although I am not suggesting you nominate this there. However, I suggest you go over the article (one more peer review perhaps?). --Efe (talk) 15:32, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- Do you think this has a chance at FAC? ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 15:25, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 15:25, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Fancy steam rolling this baby through FAC? Got all the right ingredients and the spices. Just the oven needs to be pre-heated. Lol, you get what I mean. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:40, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- Are you willing to put this on another peer review? There seems to be a little more comprehensiveness issue(s) that might have to be addressed before FAC. --Efe (talk) 15:33, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- Yes of course Mark. I would want it to go through another two PRs probably before I even submit it. — Legolas (talk2me) 04:18, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Corbin Bleu
The reason the copy you restored looked so much better is that is was full of copyright violations. The reason the primary editor on the article (Chace Watson) and his several dozen sockpuppets are all blocked is because of the constant copyright problems. We have to be careful when restoring things from the article's history.—Kww(talk) 14:25, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Kww. I just saw the Sockpuppet investigation link. Then I suspected that IP suggesting the version was the same person who used to do the thing. Anyway, after I have restored (via copy and paste), I began the copy editing / clean up. Nevertheless, I'll agree with the revert and enhance the article instead by taking what's essential and compliant to Wiki policies from that version that was allegedly full of copyright violations. Thanks. --Efe (talk) 14:31, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- Where did the IP editor make that request? Be careful that you don't have problems with WP:BAN#Edits by and on behalf of banned editors, which directs that we should not edit based on requests by banned editors unless we have independent reasons for making those edits.—Kww(talk) 14:56, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, now I see it. I think you have pretty clearly violated it, although I understand that you did so completely innocently.—Kww(talk) 14:58, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- I think I did. I'm trying to fix the article in the best way that I can. --Efe (talk) 10:27, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Kww. I am wondering why my edits were reverted. As I have said in my prior edits, I agree with the revert of my earliest edits to the article that were a direct (but completely innocent) compliance to the suggestion of the IP, which I later realized is someone who was involved in the sockpuppetry. But then again, I said that I will start again and improve the article based on my personal will. WP:BAN states in part: "Wikipedians in turn are not permitted to post or edit material at the direction of a banned editor (sometimes called proxy editing or proxying) unless they are able to confirm that the changes are verifiable and they have independent reasons for making them." I therefore request that the revert be reverted. Thank you. --Efe (talk) 15:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- Can you explain to me what your "... independent reasons for making them" are? I don't see that you normally edit articles about Disney stars, High School Musical, or any other area that would naturally lead you to edit an article about Corbin Bleu.—Kww(talk) 16:31, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- Simply because I am a Wikipedian and I see there's a lot fix in that article. --Efe (talk) 15:48, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- Can you explain to me what your "... independent reasons for making them" are? I don't see that you normally edit articles about Disney stars, High School Musical, or any other area that would naturally lead you to edit an article about Corbin Bleu.—Kww(talk) 16:31, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Kww. I am wondering why my edits were reverted. As I have said in my prior edits, I agree with the revert of my earliest edits to the article that were a direct (but completely innocent) compliance to the suggestion of the IP, which I later realized is someone who was involved in the sockpuppetry. But then again, I said that I will start again and improve the article based on my personal will. WP:BAN states in part: "Wikipedians in turn are not permitted to post or edit material at the direction of a banned editor (sometimes called proxy editing or proxying) unless they are able to confirm that the changes are verifiable and they have independent reasons for making them." I therefore request that the revert be reverted. Thank you. --Efe (talk) 15:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- I think I did. I'm trying to fix the article in the best way that I can. --Efe (talk) 10:27, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, now I see it. I think you have pretty clearly violated it, although I understand that you did so completely innocently.—Kww(talk) 14:58, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- Where did the IP editor make that request? Be careful that you don't have problems with WP:BAN#Edits by and on behalf of banned editors, which directs that we should not edit based on requests by banned editors unless we have independent reasons for making those edits.—Kww(talk) 14:56, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello, why is stopping your edits in the article, I've been good and coordinated manner. Unfortunately, it will remain like this article? Please the article need to fix. --94.98.73.51 (talk) 18:41, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 November 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom nominations open, participation grants finalized, survey results on perceptions on Wikipedia released
- WikiProject report: Having a Conference with WikiProject India
- Arbitration report: Abortion and Betacommand 3 in evidence phase, three case requests outstanding
Tips?
Hey there! Hope you are having a wonderful Monday :) I was searching for a model article for Techno Cumbia, a GAN, and stumbled on Irreplaceable, an article you helped achieve FA status. The reviewer who had done the last peer review of the article I'm working on suggested that the composition section of Irreplaceable is a perfect model, however, I don't know too much about music notes and the way to represent them in the way you had done in the article. So, I was wondering, if its not too much to ask, if you can help me expand the composition section of Techno Cumbia by hearing the song and writing down its music notes (similar to Irreplaceable)? Best, Jonayo! Selena 4 ever 18:41, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
- I think you already have added the basic info there. What else would you like to incorporate? --Efe (talk) 07:43, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 November 2011
- Discussion report: Much ado about censorship
- WikiProject report: Working on a term paper with WikiProject Academic Journals
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: End in sight for Abortion case, nominations in 2011 elections
- Technology report: Mumbai and Brighton hacked; horizontal lists have got class
The Signpost: 28 November 2011
- News and notes: Arb's resignation sparks lightning RfC, Fundraiser 2011 off to a strong start, GLAM in Qatar
- In the news: The closed, unfriendly world of Wikipedia, fundraiser fun and games, and chemists vs pornstars
- Recent research: Quantifying quality collaboration patterns, systemic bias, POV pushing, the impact of news events, and editors' reputation
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Bugle
- Featured content: The best of the week
Hey Efe
How are you Efe? I hope you have seen that "Rehab" progressed a lot. Anyway, are you able to give your vote for it at the FAC? — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 21:58, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Efe, there are a responses at your comments on the "Rehab" FAC. Can you please check them? Thanks. — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 14:43, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 December 2011
- News and notes: Amsterdam gets the GLAM treatment, fundraising marches on, and a flourish of new admins
- In the news: A Wikistream of real time edits, a call for COI reform, and cracks in the ivory tower of knowledge
- Discussion report: Trial proposed for tool apprenticeship
- WikiProject report: This article is about WikiProject Disambiguation. For other uses...
- Featured content: This week's Signpost is for the birds!
Comments at FAC
Hi (!), and thank you for your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It)/archive3. Jivesh has addressed your points, so it will be good if you can have a look over the article again. Cheers, and merry Christmas --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 09:17, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- Replied. --Efe (talk) 13:27, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- Some replies and questions there. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:37, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- Again. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:55, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- Have a look now. I have done everything you wanted. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:43, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Jivesh. I have changed my "leaning to oppose" to "comments" only. As you can see, I cannot keep up with your pace, and I may not be able to certainly justify my previous "vote". --Efe (talk) 15:16, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Mark. What do you mean? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 15:17, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hehe. Am I unclear? --Efe (talk) 15:24, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Mark. What do you mean? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 15:17, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Jivesh. I have changed my "leaning to oppose" to "comments" only. As you can see, I cannot keep up with your pace, and I may not be able to certainly justify my previous "vote". --Efe (talk) 15:16, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Have a look now. I have done everything you wanted. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:43, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Again. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:55, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- Some replies and questions there. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:37, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- A reply at the FAC. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 15:24, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- As i told you before, from time to time, i do not understand sentences in English. I mean, as long as you use short sentences, i will understand. Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 15:25, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Removed as you want. Bye. Take care. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 17:09, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- As i told you before, from time to time, i do not understand sentences in English. I mean, as long as you use short sentences, i will understand. Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 15:25, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi Mark. Hope you are great man. Hey remember you had a problem with the sentence regrading Knowles' talent... So how is this allowed at the end of this section? Does not WP:POV apply here? If no, then i think i can add back the sentence about Beyonce's talent, can't I? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 05:44, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- I would say its a poor addition to the article, that being unsupported by additional information. However, it's different from that which I am nitpicking on the SL FAC. Might want to comment on Rehab FAC? --Efe (talk) 14:43, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- I have already commented but i won't tell them to remove it as i think such things are supposed to be in an article. Even what you see critics writing are their own opinion. That's a fact. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 16:19, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Bilal Khan(Singer)
Why did u deleted this article Bilal Khan(Singer) ? We want this article back please restore this article ASAP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sabpk (talk • contribs) 12:21, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Please provide link where this one is redirected. This was deleted because it falls under CSD#G8. Thank you. --Efe (talk) 14:42, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 December 2011
- Opinion essay: Wikipedia in Academe – and vice versa
- News and notes: Research project banner ads run afoul of community
- In the news: Bell Pottinger investigation, Gardner on gender gap, and another plagiarist caught red-handed
- WikiProject report: Spanning Nine Time Zones with WikiProject Russia
- Featured content: Wehwalt gives his fifty cents; spies, ambushes, sieges, and Entombment
The Signpost: 19 December 2011
- News and notes: Anti-piracy act has Wikimedians on the defensive, WMF annual report released, and Indic language dynamics
- In the news: To save the wiki: strike first, then makeover?
- Discussion report: Polls, templates, and other December discussions
- WikiProject report: A dalliance with the dismal scientists of WikiProject Economics
- Featured content: Panoramas with Farwestern and a good week for featured content
- Arbitration report: The community elects eight arbitrators
My Sincere Wishes For This Festive Season
★*★*★*★*★*★*★*★* Merry Christmas And Happy New Year 2012 *★*★*★*★*★*★*★*★ | ||
I Wish You And Your Family A Merry Christmas And A Happy New Year 2012. May The New Year Bring Much Happiness, Prosperity, Peace, And Success In Your Life. I Am Very Happy To be Part of Wikipedia And To Have Great Friends Like You. Cheers.
- From A Big Fan of ----> Jivesh1205 (Talk) 16:20, 21 December 2011 (UTC) |
- Hi Jivesh. Thank you for the greetings. Belated Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! Wishing you more FAs to come. --Efe (talk) 13:56, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- You are welcome Mark and thanks as well. Sorry for my aggressive-like behavior at the FAC. It's just that some of your points totally evoked the angry man inside me. Lol. But remember that those issues are related to our contributions, not our friendship. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:04, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- I ma nominating "Halo" this week. I have also recently revamped "If I Were a Boy" (one of my fist GAs). I spent December creating tonnes of song articles for Beyonce. Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:06, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ever since, I really don't believe that you're semi retired. BTW, have you seen this? --Efe (talk) 14:11, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol at the first sentence. What did you actually mean? :D Yes I saw that :( Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:14, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- Because you still edit a lot. --Efe (talk) 14:29, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol. I am not semi retired.
I forgot to remove the template...Lol. I removed it since long. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:30, 28 December 2011 (UTC)- Sorry for the intrusion. I am editing parts of the article "Halo". Good luck. --Efe (talk) 14:33, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oh you don't have to excuse yourself. I down own the article. Lol. Please continue your small edits. They are helping the article. :D Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:58, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry for the intrusion. I am editing parts of the article "Halo". Good luck. --Efe (talk) 14:33, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol. I am not semi retired.
- Because you still edit a lot. --Efe (talk) 14:29, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol at the first sentence. What did you actually mean? :D Yes I saw that :( Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:14, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ever since, I really don't believe that you're semi retired. BTW, have you seen this? --Efe (talk) 14:11, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- I ma nominating "Halo" this week. I have also recently revamped "If I Were a Boy" (one of my fist GAs). I spent December creating tonnes of song articles for Beyonce. Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:06, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- You are welcome Mark and thanks as well. Sorry for my aggressive-like behavior at the FAC. It's just that some of your points totally evoked the angry man inside me. Lol. But remember that those issues are related to our contributions, not our friendship. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:04, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 December 2011
- Recent research: Psychiatrists: Wikipedia better than Britannica; spell-checking Wikipedia; Wikipedians smart but fun; structured biological data
- News and notes: Fundraiser passes 2010 watermark, brief news
- WikiProject report: The Tree of Life
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, one set for acceptance, arbitrators formally appointed by Jimmy Wales
- Technology report: Wikimedia in Go Daddy boycott, and why you should 'Join the Swarm'
Ask
Hi Mark. So do you mean it looks good now? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:12, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Happy New Year. Lol. Forgot to wish you. By the way, what do you think of the article as a whole? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:22, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- More efforts on the organization of facts, perhaps. When the structure flows very well, editing will come easy for you and your cohorts. And please avoid original research. --Efe (talk) 12:23, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- There is no OR. Well, I have asked Nikki and Sandy for some very good copy-editors. They gave me quite a long list. I contacted some. They will look at the article one by one. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:28, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- How do you feel about 4 now? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:30, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) The source says Bogart "was going to take over some food and hang out with" Tedder, yet wiki says they were strolling. IMO it qualifies as an OR. --Efe (talk) 12:33, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- What do you mean? The album itself or the wiki article? --Efe (talk) 12:34, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- How should I paraphrase the sentence then? I was asking about the album itself. I am mesmerized by everything on it. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:36, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Just simply say Kidd visited Tedder, or if you want detailed, you could include the other facts. --Efe (talk) 12:38, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, it is her best album so far. I can't stop listening to some of the songs. It just sucks it only sold more than a million in the US. --Efe (talk) 12:39, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yes but you know, selling one million in the US nowadays is a big achievement. Rihanna had three number one singles and a list of top 20s and sold only 1.5 million copies of her album. Katy did 1.9 million copies with five number one singles. Lady GaGa did 1.8 million (don't forget she sold 1.1 million in the opening week because of the 99 cents deal). Beyonce has sold 1,036,000 copies with two flop singles and a moderate hit. :)) The queen!!!! Added to that she did not choose any festive season to release the album. MOST IMPORTANTLY, Beyonce's label did not discount her album. She sells at $13 while the others sell at $4 to $6. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:47, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yah. I think its a fact. Whether the singles are a flop or not, she can still a million, let alone being number one (four times). Its just that the new generation did not connect well with her music now. --Efe (talk) 12:52, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- What I like even more is that her number one singles last. She has only 5, yet 35 weeks at the top. Some people have eleven but....... Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:01, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yah. I think its a fact. Whether the singles are a flop or not, she can still a million, let alone being number one (four times). Its just that the new generation did not connect well with her music now. --Efe (talk) 12:52, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yes but you know, selling one million in the US nowadays is a big achievement. Rihanna had three number one singles and a list of top 20s and sold only 1.5 million copies of her album. Katy did 1.9 million copies with five number one singles. Lady GaGa did 1.8 million (don't forget she sold 1.1 million in the opening week because of the 99 cents deal). Beyonce has sold 1,036,000 copies with two flop singles and a moderate hit. :)) The queen!!!! Added to that she did not choose any festive season to release the album. MOST IMPORTANTLY, Beyonce's label did not discount her album. She sells at $13 while the others sell at $4 to $6. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:47, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, it is her best album so far. I can't stop listening to some of the songs. It just sucks it only sold more than a million in the US. --Efe (talk) 12:39, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Just simply say Kidd visited Tedder, or if you want detailed, you could include the other facts. --Efe (talk) 12:38, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- How should I paraphrase the sentence then? I was asking about the album itself. I am mesmerized by everything on it. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:36, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- What do you mean? The album itself or the wiki article? --Efe (talk) 12:34, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) The source says Bogart "was going to take over some food and hang out with" Tedder, yet wiki says they were strolling. IMO it qualifies as an OR. --Efe (talk) 12:33, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- How do you feel about 4 now? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:30, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- There is no OR. Well, I have asked Nikki and Sandy for some very good copy-editors. They gave me quite a long list. I contacted some. They will look at the article one by one. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:28, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- More efforts on the organization of facts, perhaps. When the structure flows very well, editing will come easy for you and your cohorts. And please avoid original research. --Efe (talk) 12:23, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 January 2012
- Interview: The Gardner interview
- News and notes: Things bubbling along as Wikimedians enjoy their holidays
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Part III
- Featured content: Ghosts of featured content past, present, and future
- Arbitration report: New case accepted, four open cases, terms begin for new arbitrators
The Signpost: 09 January 2012
- Technological roadmap: 2011's technological achievements in review, and what 2012 may hold
- News and notes: Fundraiser 2011 ends with a bang
- WikiProject report: From Traditional to Experimental: WikiProject Jazz
- Featured content: Contentious FAC debate: a week in review
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Betacommand 3
The Signpost: 16 January 2012
- Special report: English Wikipedia to go dark on January 18
- Sister projects: What are our sisters up to now?
- News and notes: WMF on the looming SOPA blackout, Wikipedia turns 11, and Commons passes 12 million files
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Beer
- Featured content: Lecen on systemic bias in featured content
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, Betacommand case deadlocked, Muhammad images close near
The Signpost: 23 January 2012
- News and notes: SOPA blackout, Orange partnership
- WikiProject report: The Golden Horseshoe: WikiProject Toronto
- Featured content: Interview with Muhammad Mahdi Karim and the best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Muhammad images, AUSC call for applications
- Technology report: Looking ahead to MediaWiki 1.19 and related issues
The Signpost: 30 January 2012
- In the news: Zambian wiki-assassins, Foundation über alles, editor engagement and the innovation plateau
- Recent research: Language analyses examine power structure and political slant; Wikipedia compared to commercial databases
- WikiProject report: Digging Up WikiProject Palaeontology
- Featured content: Featured content soaring this week
- Arbitration report: Five open cases, voting on proposed decisions in two cases
- Technology report: Why "Lua" is on everybody's lips, and when to expect MediaWiki 1.19
The Signpost: 06 February 2012
- News and notes: The Foundation visits Tunisia, analyzes donors
- In the news: Leading scholar hails Wikipedia, historians urged to contribute while PR pros remain shunned
- Discussion report: Discussion swarms around Templates for deletion and returning editors of colourful pasts
- WikiProject report: The Eye of the Storm: WikiProject Tropical Cyclones
- Featured content: Talking architecture with MrPanyGoff
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, final decision in Muhammad images, Betacommand 3 near closure
MSU Interview
Dear Efe,
My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, were it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.
So a few things about the interviews:
- Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
- Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
- All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
- All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
- The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.
Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.
If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.
Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) 18:17, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 February 2012
- Special report: Fundraising proposals spark a furore among the chapters
- News and notes: Foundation launches Legal and Community Advocacy department
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Stub Sorting
- Featured content: The best of the week
The Signpost: 20 February 2012
- Special report: The plight of the new page patrollers
- News and notes: Fundraiser row continues, new director of engineering
- Discussion report: Discussion on copyrighted files from non-US relation states
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Poland
- Featured content: The best of the week
The Signpost: 27 February 2012
- News and notes: Finance meeting fallout, Gardner recommendations forthcoming
- Recent research: Gender gap and conflict aversion; collaboration on breaking news; effects of leadership on participation; legacy of Public Policy Initiative
- Discussion report: Focus on admin conduct and editor retention
- WikiProject report: Just don't call it "sci-fi": WikiProject Science Fiction
- Arbitration report: Final decision in TimidGuy ban appeal, one case remains open
- Technology report: 1.19 deployment stress, Meta debates whether to enforce SUL
The Signpost: 05 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapter-selected Board seats, an invite to the Teahouse, patrol becomes triage, and this week in history
- In the news: Heights reached in search rankings, privacy and mental health info; clouds remain over content policing
- Discussion report: COI and NOTCENSORED: policies under discussion
- WikiProject report: We don't bite: WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles
- Featured content: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments announced, one case remains open
The Signpost: 12 March 2012
- Interview: Liaising with the Education Program
- Women and Wikipedia: Women's history, what we're missing, and why it matters
- Arbitration analysis: A look at new arbitrators
- Discussion report: Nothing changes as long discussions continue
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Women's History
- Featured content: Extinct humans, birds, and Birdman
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in 'Article titles', only one open case
- Education report: Diverse approaches to Wikipedia in Education
The Signpost: 19 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapters Council proposals take form as research applications invited for Wikipedia Academy and HighBeam accounts
- Discussion report: Article Rescue Squadron in need of rescue yet again
- WikiProject report: Lessons from another Wikipedia: Czech WikiProject Protected Areas
- Featured content: Featured content on the upswing!
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence 'review' opened, Article titles at voting
The Signpost: 26 March 2012
- News and notes: Controversial content saga continues, while the Foundation tries to engage editors with merchandising and restructuring
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Rock Music
- Featured content: Malfunctioning sharks, toothcombs and a famous mother: featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review at evidence, article titles closed
- Recent research: Predicting admin elections; studying flagged revision debates; classifying editor interactions; and collecting the Wikipedia literature
- Education report: Universities unite for GLAM; and High Schools get their due.
Please accept my appologies
Hi Mark. I hope you are in good health. I have realized that I was very rude to you lately. I am deeply regretting everything. Please accept my sincere apologies Mark. I may be 18 years old but I may not have the maturity someone of my age normally (should) have. Please forgive me. I hope I get a favorable response from you. Please. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 15:29, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Jivesh. I'm fine. Let's forget it. How are you? --Efe (talk) 04:49, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 April 2012
- Interview: An introduction to movement roles
- Arbitration analysis: Case review: TimidGuy ban appeal
- News and notes: Berlin reforms to movement structures, Wikidata launches with fanfare, and Wikipedia's day of mischief
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
- Featured content: Snakes, misnamed chapels, and emptiness: featured content this week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review in third week, one open case
Block request
Would you be willing to block this user? Thanks, SwisterTwister talk 06:00, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- Issued final warning. --Efe (talk) 06:05, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- Blocked already by another admin. Thanks. --Efe (talk) 06:05, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Here We Go Again (Ray Charles song)/archive3
You commented at both of the prior FACs, so as a courtesy, I am notifying you of Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Here We Go Again (Ray Charles song)/archive3.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 12:36, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 April 2012
- News and notes: Projects launched in Brazil and the Middle East as advisors sought for funds committee
- WikiProject report: The Land of Steady Habits: WikiProject Connecticut
- Featured content: Assassination, genocide, internment, murder, and crucifixion: the bloodiest of the week
- Arbitration report: Arbitration evidence-limit motions, two open cases
Good article reassessment
An article that you have been involved in editing, Yeah! (Usher song) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the good article reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article.
- Sorry but I have delisted the article, seven days was ample time to address the issues. Till I Go Home (talk) 08:43, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Seav.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Seav.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:41, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Replying to your message above...
Hi Mark. I am so happy you have no hard feelings *weeps* Well, I am fine but so inactive over here lately. Lol. Check my contributions. I am working now and my goodness, I do not get the time to edit nor revert vandalism. How are you? How's life lately from your part? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 04:54, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
- Been busy. Actually its just the same routine, but I have been into movie watching lately, so that's minus my time for internet surfing. hehe. --Efe (talk) 14:10, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 April 2012
- Arbitration analysis: Inside the Arbitration Committee Mailing List
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Facilitator: Silver seren
- Discussion report: The future of pending changes
- WikiProject report: The Butterflies and Moths of WikiProject Lepidoptera
- Featured content: A few good sports: association football, rugby league, and the Olympics vie for medals
The Signpost: 23 April 2012
- Investigative report: Spin doctors spin Jimmy's "bright line"
- WikiProject report: Skeptics and Believers: WikiProject The X-Files
- Featured content: A mirror (or seventeen) on this week's featured content
- Arbitration report: Evidence submissions close in Rich Farmbrough case, vote on proposed decision in R&I Review
- Technology report: Wikimedia Labs: soon to be at the cutting edge of MediaWiki development?
The Signpost: 30 April 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Consultant: Pete Forsyth
- Discussion report: 'ReferenceTooltips' by default
- WikiProject report: The Cartographers of WikiProject Maps
- Featured content: Featured content spreads its wings
- Arbitration report: R&I Review remains in voting, two open cases