User talk:Eesimonds

Welcome!

Hello, Eesimonds, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 02:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Other goodies

You might want to copy these user:Jim1138/Suggested user page stuff to your user page: user:Eesimonds for reference. Others have much more comprehensive reference works on their user pages. Cheers and Welcome! Jim1138 (talk) 02:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dava Newman

I undid your edit to Dava Newman as it was unreferenced. Adding references is how we ensure that content is correct. Without references, a reader can not easily validate information and there is no presumption of accuracy. This is covered by the Wikipedia policy of wp:verifiability. Please wp:cite your edits with wp:reliable sources. See Help:Citation Style 1 and wp:inline citations Also, it appears that this edit may be considered wp:original research (OR) which should be avoided as Wikipedia is not a publisher of original content. We only use reliable second sources. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 07:41, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Locomotion

Hi. I like your article on locomotion in space, but I'm afraid you've gone a bit gonzo about linking it. "See also" and inline links should be for articles that are very strictly relevant and on-topic, otherwise pretty much everything could be linked. I've reverted some of your links for this reason, but feel free to disagree with me - preferably on the article's talk page. Andyjsmith (talk) 16:48, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]