Dan Castellaneta.jpg =

Do not add images, such as Image:Dan Castellaneta.jpg, under incorrect licenses. Unless you are the image's creator, you may not claim it under GNU Free Documentation or Creative Commons licenses.-Wafulz 04:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make unconstructive edits to articles, like you did to Irving Middle School (Lincoln, Nebraska). None of those alumni were notable enough. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.85.193.239 (talk) 17:03, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Old KPTM Station Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Old KPTM Station Logo.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:10, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Foodnet

A tag has been placed on Foodnet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dawn bard (talk) 18:58, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indef

This user has been blocked indef for sending abusive/threatening emails. Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 13:44, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Newkptm.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Newkptm.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:03, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eegeebs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't truthfully believe Chrislk02 understands what I was telling him about Truthful Alumni that are at least locally known in Lincoln, Nebraska that graduated from Irving Middle School because I am a real graduate of Irving Middle School. Google Erich Gebers if you don't believe me. At the time, I was just a little ticked off. I am sorry, Chrislk02.

Decline reason:

You were blocked a year and a half ago and you still seem angry. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:13, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eegeebs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just stopped editing because of some Wikipedia people know better than they really do. I bring the most honest truth. I am a Scout, I am just as honest as Brian Williams.

Decline reason:

No grounds for unblocking provided. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 00:33, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eegeebs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to tell you that I regret sending Chrislk02 nasty e-mails because I really just need to cool my jets, and I promise not to send nasty e-mails ever again. If I have a problem, I will ask in a nice way. I am just two merit badges away from achieving the rank of Eagle in Boy Scouts.

Decline reason:

You still really haven't addressed the reason for your previous block nor do you seem to understand the problems. Also, per jpgordon, it seems that you're operating multiple accounts, which makes me even more hesitant to unblock you. TN X Man 14:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why not just stick to your other account? It has no blocks or nasty history, and it seems to be another name you're known as. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 01:23, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]