User talk:Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeest199993123

March 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Stella Price has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Stella Price was changed by Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeest199993123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959464 on 2016-03-24T07:12:47+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:12, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Abi Branning. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Abi Branning was changed by Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeest199993123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967557 on 2016-03-24T07:16:48+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:16, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sarah-Louise Platt, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Sarah-Louise Platt was changed by Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeest199993123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96592 on 2016-03-24T07:26:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:26, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeest199993123

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeest199993123, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cahk (talk) 07:28, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Susannah Constantine.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Susannah Constantine was changed by Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeest199993123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956738 on 2016-03-24T07:41:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:41, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:49, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeest199993123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'am honest about my unblock. I'm sorry about vandalism. Okay I never vandalise because it was a joke. I don't know how you can be so brave. My unblock is precious as my Girls children from London. Sorry about my flipping vandalism. Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeest199993123 (talk) 00:04, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nonsense. There's no indication that unblocking you would improve the encyclopedia. Huon (talk) 00:08, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeest199993123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'am so sorry about vandalism but i want to get block lifted right right now. I suggest i will make good contributions one day if you wish or dunno? Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeest199993123 (talk) 07:47, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You suggest you will "make good contributions one day if you wish or dunno"? If you keep making barely literate requests like this then someone is likely to remove your ability to edit this talk page, so I suggest you put a lot more effort into any new request you might make. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:27, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.