User talk:Edwin keen

Welcome!

Hello, Edwin keen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —Paleo Neonate – 14:01, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Edwin keen (talk) 14:42, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bold-revert-discuss cycle

Please see WP:BRD. When an edit is contested, one is expected to form consensus on the relevant article's talk page to restore them. The revert's edit summary raised a valid concern: WP:LEAD is a summary of the article's body. Thanks, —Paleo Neonate – 14:01, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new around here, but that does not seem like a valid concern. A summary needs to not be misleading about the relevant science. Saying "the supposed" heritability of IQ makes it seem like the relevant twin studies and adoption studies haven't found contributions of genes on IQ. This is false. Edwin keen (talk) 04:12, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]