User talk:Edwin Edpalina

Welcome!

Hello, Edwin Edpalina, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Makuhari International School, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:07, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Makuhari International School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Makuhari International School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Makuhari International School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. OlYeller21^Talktome 21:21, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Your addition to Makuhari International School has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. The text is taken verbatim from this magazine. Is there a reason why this has been done? OlYeller21^Talktome 21:24, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Edwin Edpalina. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Makuhari International School, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. As the music teacher for American International School, you have a close connection with the subject of this article. Please review our WP:COI policy to avoid issues in the future. OlYeller21^Talktome 21:31, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Makuhari international school

A tag has been placed on Makuhari international school requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 13:04, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Makuhari International School

I removed Makuhari International School from the Chiba Prefecture, city of Chiba, and Mihama-ku articles. It might be appropriate once an exhaustive list or article on all secondary educational institutions in Mihama or the city of Chiba is written.Prburley (talk) 13:12, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Chiba Prefecture. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:51, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Mihama-ku, Chiba. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:52, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did at List of schools in Japan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:53, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Makuhari international school for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Makuhari international school is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Makuhari international school until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 18:29, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Makuhari international school, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 04:02, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming or advertising. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To Daniel Case I'm new to WIKI and didn't realize I have those several notices up for me when I tried to insert weblinks related to the article I'm writing (Makuhari International School). One page said: "please expand the listing" so I never thought I was "spamming" when I added link to this page. Today, when I opened this TalkPage, I'm already blocked - I can't even go the appeal this block page. Please reconsider ublocking me. Thanks, Edwin Edpalina Edwin Edpalina (talk) 08:33, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Edwin Edpalina (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

A note has been added to add more citations for verifications on my article. I want to help improve this by inserting verifiable links- please consider unblocking me. Thanks

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. TN X Man 15:03, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Edwin Edpalina (talk) 14:10, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Edwin Edpalina (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This note has been previously added and I want you to please re-consider: "I'm new to WIKI and didn't realize I have those several notices up for me when I tried to insert weblinks related to the article I'm writing (Makuhari International School). One page said: "please expand the listing" so I never thought I was "spamming" when I added link to this page. Today, when I opened this TalkPage, I'm already blocked - I can't even go the appeal this block page. Please reconsider ublocking me." I do understand now that doing so will make no good for WIKI. Thanks.

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Edwin EdpalinaEdwin Edpalina (talk) 15:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]