User talk:Edwardx/Archive 2006-2010
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Edwardx. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome
|
Hi - Thanks for the Charles Pratt edit in List of Amherst College people. I'm wondering, though, if the dorm gift was for Morris Pratt (which has always been a dorm afaik) or Charles Pratt (which used to be the geology building and is becoming a dorm as I type.) The name makes me suspect the latter; do you know? - Pjmorse 11:49, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Your recent contribution(s) to Wikipedia are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! Leuko 15:08, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Philanthropist, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Philanthropist. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. — Sebastian (talk) 04:01, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
John Braham
Hi, there seems to be a slightly bizarre situation in that both the Brompton Cemetery [1] and Kensal Green Cemetery [2] websites state he is buried, or at least commemarated in both these places? Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 16:40, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Vice Admiral Robert Fitzroy's last resting place
Previous edits correctly identified FitzRoy's burial at Beulah Hill, not Brompton as you have written. He has a large fenced-in memorial in All Saint’s churchyard there that is easily visible from the main road. [3] It is in the list of Buildings of Special Archaeological or Historic Interest. [4] I have never heard of the Brompton "claiming" him. Ephebi 23:24, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Thanks for adding Roosevelt's birthday and the photo, but your note says 1858, and yet you left the article to say 1853. Is 1858 just a typo? Thanks! -- Ssilvers 17:39, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
People buried in Brompton Cemetery
As a fellow prolific cemetery editor, you might like to check if the proposed deletion of the category is appropriate. Like me, I guess you weren't made aware that a CFD is proposed to delete it. I suspect you will have an opinion on the best way to maintain a list of notable burials. Ephebi 17:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- You may comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 June 19. Dr. Submillimeter 18:48, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:DanielCooperBrompton01.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DanielCooperBrompton01.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:59, 29 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 21:59, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
- I had thought that tagging it with "Source self-photographed" would be sufficient. It is a photograph that I have taken of the funerary monument of someone who died in 1902, so surely there cannot be any copyright issues. Or am I mising something here? Edwardx 08:43, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Rowland Hill
While I was in London in April, I was unable to get to take a photo of the statue of Rowland Hill in King Edward Street. Here is a reference to it. I noticed you recent additions of burials in Kensal Green Cemetery/West London Crematorium - there must be more than a quarter of a million people buried there. I spent a week photographing there in the late 1960s. Maybe, as you live in London, are Wikiaddicted and a keen photographer, you might get a chance to provide a photo for this article. Cheers TIA ww2censor 16:01, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- I will put that Rowland Hill statue photo on my to-do-list. As a postal historian, you will no doubt have noticed that I put up a photo of William Mulready's fine funerary monument. Once upon a time, I collected stamps and postal history, but now I only collect old passports. I will be making some contributions in that area, but it is probably not of much interest to you. Edwardx 16:35, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- The William Mulready photo was the one I spotted on my watchlist and followed through to you from there. Thanks for the interest. I wanted to get a Rowland Hill burial photo that is in Westminster Abbey, but, beside closing at 1:00 PA on Saturday (!), apparently photography is not permitted there. Do you know anything about that or can one sneak a photo? Passports, well I have some, but no real interest. Anyway thanks ww2censor 17:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Images
Please, upload your free images on Commons, so everybody can use them, not just English Wikipedia! You uploaded more than 100 useful images, but other Wikipedias can't use them. Please upload free images on Commons! Thank you! Dantadd 21:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the tip. I have uploaded 8 more images, all on Wikipedia Commons, also under the name Edwardx. I will try to get round to putting all the others I have done so far up on Commons, but please let me know if there are you particularly want to use, and I will do those first. Edwardx 11:13, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, please don't add the passport images to Commons, unless you find evidence they are in the public domain or released by their creator under a GFDL-compatible license. Scanning or taking a picture of copyrighted material doesn't give you the copyright--that's like taping a movie on TV and claiming you own the copyright of the copies. UK passports I am certain are "Crown copyright" and I suspect the other countries' are copyrighted by their respective governments, as well. See Image:Ukpassport-cover.jpg, for example. Seattlenow 00:17, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Image:HUN_005.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:HUN_005.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 00:47, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:HerbertLeePrattTimeCover.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:HerbertLeePrattTimeCover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 00:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:GreteMosheimPassportPhoto.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:GreteMosheimPassportPhoto.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 00:50, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:Greek_diplomatic_passport_1987.JPG
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Greek_diplomatic_passport_1987.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:Austrian_passport_1931.JPG
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Austrian_passport_1931.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:02, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Image:UK_visitor_passport_1971.JPG
I have tagged Image:UK_visitor_passport_1971.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:03, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:UK_passport_1924.JPG
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:UK_passport_1924.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:07, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:USA_passport_1976.JPG
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:USA_passport_1976.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:Swiss_passport_1956.JPG
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Swiss_passport_1956.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:Danish_passport_1952.JPG
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Danish_passport_1952.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:1952_Belgian_passport.JPG
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:1952_Belgian_passport.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:1951_Convention_Travel_Document.JPG
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:1951_Convention_Travel_Document.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:Spain_passport_1963.JPG
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Spain_passport_1963.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:Norway_passport_1923.JPG
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Norway_passport_1923.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:New_Zealand_passport_1949.JPG
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:New_Zealand_passport_1949.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:Thailand_passport_1960.JPG
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Thailand_passport_1960.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:Philippines_passport_1969.JPG
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Philippines_passport_1969.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:Malaysia_passport_1968.JPG
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Malaysia_passport_1968.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:Japan_passport_1968.JPG
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Japan_passport_1968.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Passport Images
Hi, I note you've uploaded a number of images of passport covers recently, under CC-BY-SA, Unfrotunatly for various reasons images of passport covers may be incompatible with that form of licensing. You are STRONGLY urged to change the license tag to a 'fair use' one if you cannot confirm the copyright status in respect of the designs. In addition some jurisdictions prohibit reproduction of passports of that jurisidiction IRRESPECTIVE of any copyrights, so you would be advised to tread carefully. Sfan00 IMG 15:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Swiss passport 1957.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Swiss passport 1957.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:04, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Image credit in articles
A Wikipedia username shouldn't be mentioned in the article namespace to avoid self-references, unless, of course, it is relevant to the article like Essjay controversy. Therefore, you shouldn't add your own username in the article for an image caption. Credit for an image is provided on the image description page so there are no GFDL issues there. Do you mind if I remove all references to your username from article space? Or can you help me with it? For reference I'll be using whatlinkshere on your username in the main namespace to find this out. Thanks, Graham87 10:33, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with you, and I no longer do this. Personally, I have far too much paid work on right now, so cannot help on this for a week or two, but you are most welcome to go ahead as you have suggested. Edwardx 12:22, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- I have finished removing the image credits in the articles. Graham87 14:07, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you Edwardx 15:15, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- I have finished removing the image credits in the articles. Graham87 14:07, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Fair use disputed for Image:New Zealand passport 1949.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:New Zealand passport 1949.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:27, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mauritius passport 1948.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Mauritius passport 1948.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:38, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:India passport 1927.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:India passport 1927.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:59, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hungary passport 1938.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hungary passport 1938.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:07, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Biography Newsletter 5
 Volume IV, no. 4 - September 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Congratulations to our 225 new members |
The newsletter is back! Many things have gone on during the past few months, but many things have not. While the assessment drive helped revitalize the assessment department of the project, many other departments have received no attention. Most notably: peer review and our "workgroups". A day long IRC meeting has been planned for October 13th, with the major focus being which areas of the project are "dead", what should our goals be as a project, and how to "revive" the dead areas of our project. Contribute to the discussion on the the new channel (see below) We decided to deliver this newsletter to all project members this month but only those with their names down here will get it delivered in the future. This is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue. Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned or post news on the next issue's talk page
Lastly, a new WikiProject Biography channel has been set up on the freenode network: Our thanks to Phoenix 15 for setting it up.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Complete To Do List
Suzanne Carrell • Mullá Husayn • John Gilchrist (linguist) • Thomas Brattle •
Assessment Progress
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To receive this newsletter in the future, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 15:32, 7 October 2007 (UTC) .
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Thailand passport 1960.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Thailand passport 1960.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:47, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Danish passport 1952.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Danish passport 1952.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:31, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bulgaria passport 1944.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bulgaria passport 1944.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:47, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Argentina passport 1940.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Argentina passport 1940.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:13, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Japan passport 1968.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Japan passport 1968.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:02, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Norway passport 1923.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Norway passport 1923.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:27, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Norway passport 1986.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Norway passport 1986.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:28, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Israel passport 1959.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Israel passport 1959.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:30, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Greece passport 1937.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Greece passport 1937.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:40, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Greek diplomatic passport 1987.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Greek diplomatic passport 1987.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:46, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Peru passport 1975.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Peru passport 1975.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Romania passport 1938.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Romania passport 1938.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Uruguay passport 1980.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Uruguay passport 1980.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:46, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Philippines passport 1969.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Philippines passport 1969.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Spain passport 1963.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Spain passport 1963.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Malaysia passport 1968.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Malaysia passport 1968.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:58, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Polish passport 1934.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Polish passport 1934.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Baruch Zuckerman
Hi, Edwardx -- I don't see anything in the text of Baruch Zuckerman that indicates that he belongs in Category:Writers on Zionism. If you are familiar with his writings on the subject, would you please add that info to the article? Thanks! Cgingold (talk) 12:48, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Austrian passport 1931.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Austrian passport 1931.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:10, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Robert Keate, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://livesonline.rcseng.ac.uk/biogs/E000008b.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:21, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, I've just removed the copyrighted text from your article. Please review Wikipedia:Copyright violations for why copyright violations are bad, and try not to use any copyrighted content in Wikipedia in the future. Thanks! --Rory096 21:28, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:1952 Belgian passport.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:1952 Belgian passport.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ViperSnake151 01:52, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:1951 Convention Travel Document.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:1951 Convention Travel Document.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ViperSnake151 01:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Swiss passport 1956.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:Swiss passport 1956.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ViperSnake151 01:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Swiss passport 1956.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Swiss passport 1956.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:54, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:1952 Belgian passport.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:1952 Belgian passport.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:54, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Burials at Brompton Cemetery
Hi, you might want to check out some of the biographies that you've been adding to WP. Looking at the list of burials at Brompton Cemetery shows apparently duplicated entries for Harris & Godwin; there may be others. Best regards, Ephebi (talk) 11:09, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
NowCommons: Image:JohnFowlerBrompton01.jpg
Image:JohnFowlerBrompton01.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:John Fowler Brompton01.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:John Fowler Brompton01.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:41, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- File:EdmundFaberBrompton.jpg is now available as Commons:File:EdmundFaberBrompton.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:54, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- File:AllSaintsFulham01.jpg is now available as Commons:File:AllSaintsFulham01.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:51, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Regarding lists of people and sourcing
Hi! You said: "revert to version with list - it being unreferenced is not a valid reason for removal)" Please consider WP:BLP - The policy says "Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons — whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable — should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion, from Wikipedia articles, talk pages, user pages, and project space." In general it is a bad idea to have unsourced information related to living people - of course some people on the list are dead, but even so it is often better to start over from scratch and source it back up. WhisperToMe (talk) 16:45, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- I am aware of and agree with the WP policy that you cite, but your interpretation of it appears to be mistaken. The key word here is "contentious". In this case, for a list of people who have supposedly lived in this particular location in California, I think it extremely unlikely that any living person is going to be genuinely upset should there be a mistaken claim that they once lived there. This material is not "contentious". Of course, it would be better if even fairly trivial information about living people was properly sourced. So, rather than remove it wholesale, try to find a valid reason for removing individual names. Alternatively, why not contribute constructively and try sourcing things yourself. Edwardx (talk) 20:48, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Brompton cemetery
Something for you - just uploaded. I have lots more pictures of the cemetery, though this is my favourite Peter Damian (talk) 17:23, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Nice work!
Great work on the new Port Wakefield, Alaska article! If it can be sourced and cited, you should strongly consider putting the article up for WP:DYK! --Kralizec! (talk) 00:00, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I fleshed out your stub on John Monckton (town clerk). Since you created it, I wanted you to take a look at it. See discussion notes also. Jrcrin001 (talk) 21:09, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
This file was moved to Commons from English Wikipedia, but some description information may have got lost in the process.
As you are noted as the original uploader, or in the history for the file, it would be appreciated if you could help in reconstructing this information.
Please also consider checking Commons for other media that you may have uploaded locally, but which was subsequently transferred.
Special:Log for uploads can help in this.
Thanks for you assistance and keep uploading 'free' media :)
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:23, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Edwardx! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 271 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Ian Cognito - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:06, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Malvern College
Hi Edwardx/Archive 2006-2010! The Old Malvernians/alumnae section that you contributed to in Malvern College finally got so long that it had to be split off into a separate list page. In doing so, it's been found that for many of those noble people there is no actual proof that they ever went to the school. However, they probably did, and the entries were made in good faith. Nevertheless, the rules require everything in the encyclopedia to be verifiably sourced. It would be great therefore, if you could take a look at the list and help out if you can with providing some references. The people all have their own Wiki articles, but it is no guarantee that the mentions of Malvern College (if any) are correctly cited. Thanks. --Kudpung (talk) 17:01, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Malvern, Worcestershire
Hi Edwardx! Thanks for your concern over the Malvern, Worcestershire article. You may have noticed that this article has achieved a Good Article rating after a lot of hard work by a dedicated team. I'm just wondering if the edits you made to the list of Notable People section were really necessary. In doing so, you have introduced new errors that have needed to be cleaned up. It would help if you could suggest your ideas on the article's talk page before making edits of this kind to Good Articles - you may even be saving yourself some unnecessary work.--Kudpung (talk) 13:17, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
For your information, the John Evan Thomas page has just been moved to a new title, as above, to differentiate from John Evan Thomas (sculptor) and because it temporarily had a non-standard title. I'm updating all the links to the page, which is why I spotted the one on your user page.--Storye book (talk) 12:39, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for your help with Peter Boston. That was the first article I ever created, and I appreciate everyone's help and kindness. Miss Ivonne (talk) 22:05, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
I just moved this page to Hilda Madsen to keep with naming style - basically, got rid of the quotes. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 23:54, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Copyright problems with Walter Kaner
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Walter Kaner, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.qgazette.com/news/2005-06-29/features/031.html. As a copyright violation, Walter Kaner appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Walter Kaner has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Walter Kaner and send an email with the message to permissions-en
wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions. - If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Walter Kaner with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Walter Kaner.
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Walter Kaner and send an email with the message to permissions-en
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Lucha (talk) 15:23, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for your concern, but I think you really should have read Criteria for Speedy Deletion first. The text you refer to has been there for over three years, and does NOT violate copyright. As you will see from your talk page, your request for speedy deletion was speedily declined. Edwardx (talk) 21:20, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions about User:Edwardx. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |