User talk:Edmondhills
| This is Edmondhills's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
The article Prakhar Bindal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence of passing the notability criteria for biographies. Apart from brief mentions/quotes in 3 articles, the remaining sources are self-published profiles, one of them masquerading as an article in Entrepreneur (magazine). The company of which he is CEO and apparently sole owner is a 2 year old start-up with no significant coverage either.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Voceditenore (talk) 16:58, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright infringement at Prakhar Bindal
[edit]Please see my comments at Talk:Prakhar Bindal concerning the copyright infringement which has been removed from the article, and take them on board. Voceditenore (talk) 16:58, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Prakhar Bindal for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prakhar Bindal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prakhar Bindal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.. Voceditenore (talk) 11:06, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Notification
[edit]
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Huhshyeh. Thank you.. Jyoti (talk) 11:52, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Please maintain a wp:npov when editing and use an encyclopedic wp:tone. I undid your edit as you did not maintain Wikipedia policy. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 08:09, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Please, check the article's talk page. I have put what was cited in mainstream media. Edmondhills (talk) 08:10, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Edmondhills You just did WP:FILIBUSTER Removing a large addition for a minor error. I am reverting. Do editing not blind reverts. Jyoti (talk) 08:15, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Where does the citation state "hate crime" or "derogatory"? These are not wp:npov and are or appear to be wp:or, wp:weasel and wp:synth. This is an encyclopedia, not a place to add your opinion. Jim1138 (talk) 08:18, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Here[1] for the "hate crime" and I didn't add "derogatory". It was added by another editor. I didn't add my opinion but I reverted you as you removed some references. Please, check the diffs. Edmondhills (talk) 08:21, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- I will make one more attempt. WP:TONE is a good read. Verifiability does not guarantee inclusion. WP:NOTNEWS might also help. Jyoti (talk) 08:34, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Whatever I included maintain NPOV from sources which are widely published in mainstream media so WP:NOTNEWS doesn't apply for this incident similarly I do not see a valid reason of Verifiability does not guarantee inclusion. You can state your objections for improvement of the article on the talk page. Edmondhills (talk) 08:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- I will make one more attempt. WP:TONE is a good read. Verifiability does not guarantee inclusion. WP:NOTNEWS might also help. Jyoti (talk) 08:34, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Here[1] for the "hate crime" and I didn't add "derogatory". It was added by another editor. I didn't add my opinion but I reverted you as you removed some references. Please, check the diffs. Edmondhills (talk) 08:21, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Where does the citation state "hate crime" or "derogatory"? These are not wp:npov and are or appear to be wp:or, wp:weasel and wp:synth. This is an encyclopedia, not a place to add your opinion. Jim1138 (talk) 08:18, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Edmondhills You just did WP:FILIBUSTER Removing a large addition for a minor error. I am reverting. Do editing not blind reverts. Jyoti (talk) 08:15, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Please take part in the discussion on Talk:Pune techie murder case
[edit]Kind Regards. --Jyoti (talk) 15:22, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
A page you started (Pune techie murder case) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Pune techie murder case, Edmondhills!
Wikipedia editor Jyoti.mickey just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I think it has its space on wikipedia. Presently this article reads like a news release, and is slanted towards recent events. If continued coverage does not happen it might be better to merge it with a more notable article.
To reply, leave a comment on Jyoti.mickey's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.