User talk:Editzzzluther

Editzzzluther, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Editzzzluther! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Editzzzluther, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Editzzzluther, good luck, and have fun. KyloRen3 (talk) 07:59, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sons of the Soil : Jaipur Pink Panthers (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Sons of the Soil : Jaipur Pink Panthers may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 17:01, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, Editzzzluther, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 17:28, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't know who is Nexusadams. I'm an avid web series watcher, and hence I try to edit or create Wikipedia pages on the same. Sons of the Soil : Jaipur Pink Panthers was one such web series for which I didn't find a Wikipedia page and so I created a draft for it. I have just started my journey on Wikipedia and am unaware of many rules which I admit. I request you to please withdraw the edit ban so that I can continue with my contributions. Also, I apologize for any misunderstandings. Editzzzluther (talk) 18:24, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are not blocked from editing at this time? What is the full error message that you receive when attempting to edit pages other than this current one? --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 22:54, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am, It's stating "You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason: This account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia. Editing from ‪Nexusadams‬ has been blocked (disabled) by ‪TheSandDoctor‬ for the following reason(s):Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Editzzzluther" Editzzzluther (talk) 06:37, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That just definitively proves that you are either Nexusadams or share the same IP with them. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 15:14, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I believe this is a misinterpretation and I genuinely want to contribute to Wikipedia in my area of interest. I request you to please overturn the ban and I feel sorry for this unexpected mishap. I can assure you that I'll definitely be cautions with my future contributions and this will act as a learning curve. Editzzzluther (talk) 18:18, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 00:52, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Editzzzluther (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to emphasis that my contributions have been legitimate. I would request you to please cancel the ban and grant me another chance. As a beginner there might be some unintended contributions, but I can assure you that I'll be be more cautions on my future actions. Editzzzluther (talk) 06:47, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This does not address the stated reason for the block, the use of multiple accounts. 331dot (talk) 08:56, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Editzzzluther (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm extremely sorry, after thoroughly going through the Wikipedia guidelines, I want to admit that I know Nexusadams as he's my friend. We joined Wikipedia in order to make productive contributions. Our intentions while doing edits or creating a draft has always been in good faith. Our contributions have never been to "mislead other editors, disrupt discussions, distort consensus, avoid sanctions, evade blocks, or otherwise violate community standards and policies as mentioned in Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry. We make sure that our contributions adhere to Wikipedia guidelines and rework on the feedbacks shared. I request you to please unblock us as we have understood our mistake and feel apologetic for the same. Editzzzluther (talk) 21:20, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've gone from denying any connection to Nexusadams to claiming that you're friends and joined Wikipedia together. Given the high amount of UPE that we've seen related to topics that you've edited, I see no reason to believe that you aren't simply part of the same paid editing group. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:31, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mum Bhai has been accepted

Mum Bhai, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 15:39, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sons of the Soil : Jaipur Pink Panthers has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sons of the Soil : Jaipur Pink Panthers. Thanks! Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 21:22, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sons of the Soil: Jaipur Pink Panthers has been accepted

Sons of the Soil: Jaipur Pink Panthers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.