User talk:EditorDin

January 2018

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:16, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EditorDin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As during the holidays (between Christmas and New Year's Eve) the user "Dierikon" was on vacation, I created my own account to be able to edit pages. As you requested to delete the page "Komax Holding" by December 28, I couldn't wait until the user "Dierikon" returns from vacation to edit the mentioned page. User Dierikon and myself are not the same editor, otherwise there would have been no reason to create a new account end of 2017. As "EditorDin" is not a sock puppet could you please unblock it.

Decline reason:

Sorry, No. It sounds like you are coördinating edits with another user, (please see WP:SOCK) and like you have an outside connection with Komax Holding. Could you please address these issues? -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:14, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EditorDin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As you can see in the history of the Komax Holding page I never did any edits before the mentioned holiday season. And I don't plan to continue to edit this page. I'm not coordinating any edits with another user. It is correct that I know the user "Dierikon" and I know how much the user cares about the Komax Holding page. As I've seen that the page will be deleted by December 28 I thought, I'll do him a favor if I edit the page and thereby try to avoid deletion. If this approach was a mistake, please accept my apologies. EditorDin (talk) 07:00, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you know User:Dierikon, you also know that that editor doesn't just "care about" Komax Holding but works for them. Mentioning their vacation makes it likely that you work for the same company. Thus you have edited in violation of the Terms of Use. You didn't address that even after being asked about it. See also WP:MEAT and WP:COWORKER. Huon (talk) 22:50, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EditorDin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If you would know the company you knew that it is always closed between Christmas and New Year's Eve. Therefore, you don't need to be employed there to know that the employees are on vacation. So you can't argue that I have edited in violation of the terms of us. EditorDin (talk) 06:44, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:21, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EditorDin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that it wasn't ok to do any edits on the Komax Holding page as I know the user Dierikon. I promise you that I will neither edit this page again nor will I edit other pages if I know users who are already editing the page. In the future I will just concentrate on content which I have a completely neutral view on. EditorDin (talk) 13:34, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In successive appeals you have failed to properly address the reason for your block including the issues raised by Admin Huon, above. I am therefore revoking your talk page access. Any future appeal would need to be made through WP:UTRS. Just Chilling (talk) 15:04, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.