User talk:Editor75439

November 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Somatotype and constitutional psychology, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Most of the material you introduced was not in the original text or was from a self-published source. Allens (talk) 21:23, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Somatotype and constitutional psychology. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Allens (talk) 05:32, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring

Your recent editing history at Somatotype and constitutional psychology shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. MastCell ^Talk 20:00, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please be aware that articles dealing with the intersection of race/ethnicity and human ability have been subject to long-term agenda-driven inappropriate editing. As such, they are subject to discretionary sanctions, meaning that editors who aren't willing or able to follow this site's policies may be blocked or banned from editing the topic. The details of the discretionary sanctions are here.

I think both of the articles you've focused on - William Herbert Sheldon and somatotype and constitutional psychology - fall under the purview of these discretionary sanctions. It's probably only fair to also let you know that I'm concerned that your editing is disruptive, as you're edit-warring, removing quality sources, and attacking other editors, and if those behaviors continue, I will probably ask an uninvolved admin to consider invoking the discretionary sanctions against this account. MastCell ^Talk 20:09, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 Hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:14, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of Arbitration Enforcement request

Because you've immediately resumed your agenda-driven editing and edit-warring after your recent block, I have requested that the discretionary sanctions discussed above be applied to your account. You can find the request here, and are invited to comment there if you wish. MastCell ^Talk 18:20, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to William Herbert Sheldon appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this. Thank you. Allens (talk) 18:37, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Topic banned

For your disruptive behavior, which you have been repeatedly warned about in the past, you are banned from editing pages relating to the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, broadly construed. This includes, but is not limited to, Somatotype and constitutional psychology and its talk page. NW (Talk) 18:56, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Evading your topic ban by using an IP (or another account) is not allowed. You have been blocked for a week; next time the block will be for an indefinite period of time. NW (Talk) 21:30, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]