User talk:Editingscientists

Welcome!

Hello, Editingscientists, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 15:22, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Baahubali 2: The Conclusion and Baahubali: The Beginning have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diff: [1][2] It's unclear why you removed Tamil from the language list, when it's been very clear that both chapters of Baahubali were produced simultaneously in two languages. Your changes are indistinguishable from vandalism. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Muon. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bellary, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. μ Talk 18:25, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Bellary. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. μ Talk 08:33, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, I'm Bovineboy2008. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Saaho have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. BOVINEBOY2008 13:55, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bellary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:12, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Ballari district (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Telugu

Bellary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Telugu

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bellary. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — LeoFrank ^Talk 10:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Bellary, you may be blocked from editing. — LeoFrank ^Talk 07:13, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Bellary. — LeoFrank ^Talk 15:28, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Bellary, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stop your POV pushing your Telugu language on Bellary. All the content you are adding is original research — LeoFrank ^Talk 05:49, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Bellary shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 16:36, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Bellary. Something that's correct does not automatically get added. You need to cite reliable and verifiable sources. — LeoFrank ^Talk 15:14, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently inserting unsourced changes, as you did at Bellary. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 13:33, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 10:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See [3]. If you try to evade your block again, the next block will be indefinite. Bishonen | talk 10:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC).[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 13:53, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I told you the next block would be indefinite, so here we are, I'm afraid. Bishonen | talk 13:55, 18 February 2018 (UTC).[reply]