User talk:Editing with Eric
Welcome
[edit]
|
Important Notice
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
——SN54129 12:38, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]
|
Hi Editing with Eric! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Sebastian Ulick Browne
[edit]Hello there I see you you edit Sebastian Ulick Browne page I am wondering if you have any proof of this as I am a local historian and I have questioned him have titles myself any help would be grate thanks your sincerely Joshua Joshua5252 (talk) 19:54, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hello. Which part exactly would you like to know more about?
- As for sources, the current list of what one might call "legally recognised" peers is contained in the Roll of the Peerage that can be found here from the College of Arms. The Marquess of Sligo is not included in this list, as Browne has yet prove succession to the title. The royal warrant from 2004 that established the roll can also be found on the College of Arms here. Section 3 is the relevant part, which deals with peers not on the roll and how they are not entitled to precedence by virtue of their title.
- Publications such as Debretts and Burkes typically include all peers whether they have proven succession or not. However, it must be stressed that these are commercial publications, not official/legal documents. So although Debretts might list Sebastian Browne as the 12th Marquess of Sligo, officially he is only 'Mr Sebastian Browne' and isn't entitled to any of the (now extremely diminished) privileges of being a peer. Although as mentioned before, some sources will still call him the Marquess of Sligo regardless.
- Let me know if I can help more, although I can't guarantee I will be able to because I don't known much about Browne specifically. Editing with Eric (talk) 22:21, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Sorry for getting back to you so late but I have been up to my eyes with work and family thank you for getting back to me I grateful appreciate the links you sent on they make for very interesting reading it’s strange that he is calling him self the 12 marquee of Sligo but not on the links you sent on I am from Westport co mayo where the Browne’s have there family estate but there was always a question over him That is father ulick Browne was not of the Browne’s at all and was swapped in for a child that died any more help would be gratefully appreciated hope to here back from you Joshua5252 (talk) 16:18, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Churchill war ministry
[edit]Hello, Eric. I saw your thank you message in my notifications and it is appreciated. The SPI produced a positive result and the other account has been blocked indefinitely. I see that you are very interested in UK politics and I wondered if you might be able to assist with Churchill war ministry after its freeze is lifted tonight. It needs a lot of work to bring it up to standard, especially sourcing. Anyway, thanks again and all the best. Take good care and stay safe. No Great Shaker (talk) 06:07, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- It's all good, I had also noticed the user in question contributing and strongly suspected sock puppetry to be at play (though couldn't pinpoint who the sockmaster was which made me reluctant to request a CheckUser myself). They knew way too much for a 'new' editor and were extremely controlling of the article. Regarding the article; as Opera hat pointed out a lot of the bare facts (i.e. appointee names and dates) are contained in the Butler & Butler source, I own this book as well so can use it to help in referencing. I also agree with them that the office-name-term format works better for a list of this nature. I'll reread the article talk page later and may add my thoughts to the discussion there. Thanks, Editing with Eric (talk) 08:51, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, Eric. It does look as if there is a consensus for office as primary key so I'll do a bit of adaptation to set that as default. As long as it's sortable, the readers can get a view by minister as well.
- I admit I was a bit lucky with the SPI because I suspected the wrong account controller. I assumed it must be someone who had previously edited that article. Oh, well. Thanks again. No Great Shaker (talk) 09:32, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
[edit]Hello Editing with Eric! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 17:16, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)