User talk:Editing101master

September 2018

Hello, I'm Kirbanzo. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Santo Cilauro, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kirbanzo (talk) 16:37, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Editing101master. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Santo Cilauro, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:57, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Editing101master, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Editing101master! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of University of Melbourne people have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:07, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Editing101master", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it is a misleading username. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Kirbanzo (talk) 20:54, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for your message. In follow up, if Wiki believes my username has violated the "misleading" provision I will certainly alter it accordingly. However, in examining the provision, it appears, from my perspective, that my username is not a:

 (a)  Username that impersonates other people. (To my knowledge, I'm not aware of any similar usernames to mine, and if there are it was not intentional)
 (b)  Username that gives the impression that the account has permissions which it does not have; (To my knowledge, my username does not contain the terms "administrator", "bureaucrat", "steward", "checkuser", "oversight", or similar terms, such as "admin", "sysop", or "moderator".  Naturally, I don't believe the word "Master" qualifies)
 (c)  Username which could be easily misunderstood to refer to a "bot" (which is used to identify bot accounts) or a "script" (which alludes to automated editing processes), unless the account is of that type. (To my knowledge, my username does not appear to resemble a script or bot account)
 (d)  Username that includes phrases such as "wikipedia", "wikimedia", "wiktionary", "(WMF)", or similar if they give the incorrect impression that my account may be officially affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation or one of its projects.  (My username contains none of these phrases)
 (e)  Username which resemble IP addresses (as these are expected to designate non-logged-in users), timestamps or other names which would be confusing within the Wikipedia signature format.  (My username format is not structured as an IP address)
 (f)  Usernames that appear similar to naming conventions used by community administrative processes, such as those starting with Vanished user  (My username is not named, to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with this format).

Wiki naturally has the final say. If Wiki believe my username still violates the "misleading" provision I will obviously change it. If this is the case, is your organisation able to offer suggestions (similar to my current username) that would fulfill the criteria?

Cheers and thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editing101master (talk • contribs) 11:03, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you that it is not a username violation. I am going to remove the category and consider this reviewed. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 21:36, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]