User talk:EdgardoDiazPR

November 2015

Hello, I'm Eteethan. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Quebradillas, Puerto Rico— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Eteethan (talk) 18:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to Apostasy, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 21:53, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see that the source is 4 years old. I am striking the above message in the hope that you have an updated source that would support your edit(s). If you have such a source, please cite it in the edit summary if you restore your edits, or find a footnote or other place in the text to note an updating.

As information, helpful information about editing Wikipedia can be found on various Wikipedia guideline and policy pages including: Getting started; Introduction to Wikipedia; Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset; Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style; Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources; Help:Footnotes; Wikipedia:Verifiability; Wikipedia:No original research; Wikipedia:Neutral point of view; Wikipedia:Notability; Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons; Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not; Wikipedia:Words to watch; Help:Introduction to talk pages; Wikipedia:Copyright Problems and Help:Contents. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 21:58, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Google Amp service is blocked ...

... and usually you can deduce the actual news service url from the component after the google bit. We are wanting to utilise the actual news site url, not the agglomeration. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:11, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. I have undone your changes to Mick Wallace, though. A phrase like "spread lies" is very strong, defamatory, and would require a much stronger source than Twitter to be suitable for the biography of a living person. The Guardian is a good source, but the story you linked to does not appear to mention Wallace. Please discuss the matter on the article's talk page. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 02:21, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Govindaharihari. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Peter Hitchens seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. hi there, this seems like a pattern with you, please stop such edits and assume a neutral position for any additions to this wikipedia, thanks Govindaharihari (talk) 06:05, 31 July 2018 (UTC) Govindaharihari (talk) 06:05, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ElKelvo is Wikiwatching us

I am glad for you adding of Student Organizations remarks.

I tried to improve this section, but user ElKelvo is erasing my posts about Student Organizations In UPRM Page.

His arguments are vague, based on style manuals, but other universities' wikipages hace same or more contents that ElKelvo errased from UPRM's Wikipage.

Haroldomil (talk) 20:33, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, EdgardoDiazPR. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ElKevbo (talk) 13:09, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for working and adding sources to the Puerto Rico government / executive branch articles which are in dire need of redaction. Remember to use edit summaries. TEP (talk) 2:46, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Residential Center of Educative Opportunities of Mayagüez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Primera Hora. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]