User talk:Edelmand

Greetings

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such unreasonable information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, and will result in your account being blocked.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. Again, welcome! —Kf4bdy ^talk ^contribs

AFL project

Hi mate, if you're a fan of Aussie rules, I suggest you take a look at WikiProject AFL (join by adding your name to the list of participants). Also take a look at Category:VFL/AFL players and feel free to drop me a line with any questions, or on the WP:AFL discussion page. Cheers!

R o gerthat ^Talk 02:20, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good work

Excellent additions to Bootleg recording -- keep up the good work! — Catherine\^talk 15:12, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick question -- some of the information you've added appears to be copied word-for-word from http://www.moremusic.co.uk/links/features/bootleg.htm -- did you write that article as well? If so, you're the copyright holder and all is well (although you should state that for the record on Talk:Bootleg recording. If not, you can still add the information, but you need to rephrase it in your own words -- facts aren't copyrightable, but one person's particular expression of them is. I know this is a rather ironic concern, given the subject matter, but Wikipedia doesn't infringe on others' copyrights. Thank you for all your efforts to make this article more complete! — Catherine\^talk 16:00, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

...for the new colour scheme!. The Led Zeppelin "bumble-bee" template was very hard on the eyes. Cheers and take care! Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 14:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good Egg

Thank you for reverting the vandalism at John Paul Jones! Keep up the good work, thou noble Wikipedian! Hamster Sandwich 03:11, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia Sections

You have added a lot of "Trivia" sections to Led Zeppelin articles. I'm gonna leave them in, put trivia articles are generally frowned upon, and as all or most of them are unsourced....well....Grymsqueaker 10:03, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

Thankyou for your contributions to Stolen Generation. Can I suggest you put something (even one keystroke) on your talk page. This will stop your user name appearing as a red link. These indicate empty or nonexisting pages. This is not an automated message, just some friendly advice. Welcome to wikipaedia. Regards, Fred 11:26, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Identity politics

You made some useful edits on the Identity Politics page, as it seemed to be, but you were working with an old archived that seemed to have been inadvertently restored. I have gone back to the more current version, which eliminates a lot of the POV and duplicated material.Sheldon Novick 19:57, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should we be having this discussion on the talk page for the article? Anyhow,yes it is perfectly reasonable to have contrary views included in the article, but the "criticisms" posted by an anonymous editor some months back were part of generally personal and unsourced attack on what the editor seemed to think were separatist and nationalist movements. After trying to improve it, I deleted the whole long article and posted what seemed to me at least a reasonable beginning, with an accurate sourced definition. The problem I have with the "criticisms" you have restored is that they don't entirely make sense to me, except the well known criticisms from the "center" by Arthur Schlesinger, and seem to reflect mostly the author's bias. I don't know of any source for the supposed "right" and "radical left" remarks. (I teach a seminar on the subject of national identity, at Vermont Law School, and have some sense of what is out there in the published literature.) But all that being said, I suggest we leave the article as it is (maybe someone else will fix it . . . ?) and I will try to find some time to post a sourced summary of the actual debate.Sheldon Novick 18:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:AdelOval07.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AdelOval07.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:05, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Article protection

Hi. I noticed you put {{sprotect}} on Ben Cousins, thinking that protected the article. It does not; it's something that gets put there manually after protection as an indicator of its protected status. It has no effect on the page's protection status. You have to be an administrator to protect an article. If you need administrator intervention, you can always leave me (or one of the other administrators) a talk page message. I think there's a link like WP:AIV or something which is where you request administrator intervention. - Mark 11:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Or WP:RPP. —Moondyne 01:31, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Thanks for adding the fair use rationale for Image:Led zeppelin boxset.jpg. - Slow Graffiti 16:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zep article, American or UK English?

This is a copy of the post I put up on the Zep's aricle's talk page. I don't want to get into a revert war with you. I have a feeling you agree that they're tiresome. I'm hoping there's someway to work this out; or to find out how it can be worked out.

@Edelmand Given the bewildering number of Wikipedia "policies" and "suggestions" and maybes, it's hard to know every single policy, so if I err'd against one of these policies, my bad.

And, re-reading my own post, I realize that my tone was too strident. I was having a bad day. Of course, that's no excuse for disrupting the consensus (or however it's put in wiki-speak).

I do, however, have an counter-argument to your main contention:

Since Led Zeppelin were an English band, it would seem appropriate to retain the UK English

Of course, this is true. Zep, however, became world-famous and hugely successful because of their popularity in the United States. They did come from England but they made their careers in the US, selling over 100,000,000 albums (according to the RIAA). In fact, they are the second bestselling group after The Beatles; and fourth bestselling artist after The Beatles, Elvis and Garth Brooks (US stats).

Nearly all of their music was heavily influenced by American blues, rock, rockabilly and other American "roots" music.

Also, during almost the entire duration of the band's existence, they lived in the US (because of England's insane tax laws which confiscated 98% of a musician's income back then!).

I believe this makes the use of American English the appropriate choice.

Clearly, we have a dispute that's obviously larger than just this article. I believe that the entire article should be rewritten to comply US English standards.

How can this resolved professionally? In other words, without a revert war?

PainMan 23:55, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maple Leaf Gardens

Maple Leaf Gardens is not demolished. --Skeezix1000 15:39, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tangled Up Tour

Hello. I noticed that you worked on some LZ tour articles. You might be interested in the above AFD. I understand that, as an obvious fan, you are likely not interested in a Girls Aloud tour, but I'm sure you will see my reasons for alerting you. For the record, I'm neither a Girls Aloud fan, or a LZ fan/detractor. The JPS ^{talk to me} 08:35, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Led Zeppelin project

	Hi! I've seen you around on Led Zeppelin related articles... Would you consider becoming a member of WikiProject Led Zeppelin, a WikiProject which aims to expand and improve coverage of Led Zeppelin on Wikipedia? Please feel free to join us. --MegX (talk) 23:03, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Led Zeppelin... You're not in this picture... yet! Todo: Current guidelines may be viewed at the main project page

Edelmand, I've seen your high quality edits on a number of Led Zeppelin articles. I've set up a portal and wikiproject to help organise and co-ordinate articles and would be delighted if you could sign up.

MegX (talk) 23:03, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up Edelmand! I have signed up :-) Candy (talk) 10:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- Thanks Edelmand, over the next few days I'll try and finish off the sorting tables for the articles on the project page. If you can think of anything else that needs to be done, please feel free to add it to the "to do" list. I'll leave future comments on the to do list Talk page. Thanks for the bio list. There is a new Robert Plant/Led Zeppelin biography released on the 28th February. See the Portal page news section. MegX (talk) 00:03, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Edelmand, I'm putting together an "Outreach" newsletter as part of the WikiProject. Would you like to receive a copy? Also if you have anything to contribute to it that would be cool. When reviewing the article and grading in the next few weeks, we need to discuss why an article has been graded as such. MegX (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - Edelmand, is it possible we could exchange email addresses for contact? There is some things I need to talk about. You can contact me via the email feature. MegX (talk) 00:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      - Yes, do you have an image suggestion for the project? A stalker has deleted the image. MegX (talk) 01:54, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        The main article needs a facelift. Do you want to make suggestions? MegX (talk) 00:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Court

I went to do a few improvements but kept getting edit conflicts with your good-self. You're doing a better job than I would have, so I say well done! —Moondyne 01:30, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dread Zeppelin

I hadn't noticed that someone had deleted the Dread Zeppelin cover of "Train Kept a Rollin'", so I went through the edit history and restored the section.Kww (talk) 00:48, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 8 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ahmet Ertegün Tribute Concert, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri (talk) 05:37, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

7.30 Report

The Led Zeppelin photographic exhibition in Sydney was covered by the 7.30 Report last night. Don't know if you saw it but the story can be seen at http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/ in the floating clips section. Cheers. MegX (talk) 00:02, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bogus claims made on Led Zeppelin page

Edelmand, you may be interested in that I've found the original album review by John Mendelshon for Led Zeppelin I.

http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/ledzeppelin/albums/album/103294/review/18835333/led_zeppelin_i

The wikipedia article then states:

"When Led Zeppelin's debut album was released, it received generally positive reviews. However, John Mendelsohn of Rolling Stone magazine criticised the band for plagiarising music, notably "Black Mountain Side" from Bert Jansch's "Blackwaterside" (though Jansch himself acknowledges the song as being traditional) and the riff from "Your Time Is Gonna Come" from Traffic's "Dear Mr. Fantasy". He also accused the band of mimicking black artists, and showing off. This marked the beginning of a long rift between the band and the magazine, with Led Zeppelin rejecting later requests for interviews and cover stories as their level of success escalated."

If you read the Rolling Stone article it's quite obvious the claims made in the Wikipedia article appears to be bogus. Nowhere in his review does he even mention Jansch or Traffic by name. Someone appears to have made some false attributions on the current Wikipedia article. MegX (talk) 23:51, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The saddest thing is, that claim has been on the page for close to two years yet nobody placed a "citation needed" tag to verify the claim. MegX (talk) 22:18, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well done!

On the stadium art - good stuff! Satu Suro 14:06, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Western Australia

So I take it you live in Perth? Have you ever been to Virginia? MegX (talk) 03:44, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you've done some stolen generation edits. You wouldn't happen to know a lot about civil rights and law would you? MegX (talk) 08:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah okay cool. Have you been to Italy? :) MegX (talk) 23:58, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I didn't realise you were no longer in Perth. MegX (talk) 07:06, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks mate!

I just wanted to say thank you for your help on the LA Drone article. It always bugged me that I could never find any information about it. Cheers!
JRomero (talk) 05:44, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keller Auditorium thanks

I love that this long-needed article was started by a Led Zeppelin fan and not by one of us slackers at WikiProject Oregon. I saw Robert Plant at Portland Coliseum, which was great, but I'm sure it doesn't compare. Cheers! Katr67 (talk) 04:44, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

Welcome back Edelmand :) So how is New York? =) MegX (talk) 01:08, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zeppelin Single Classifications

Hi Edelmand — I was looking around in the Led Zeppelin template and saw the list of singles. I checked each one of them and added the Single Infobox where needed. However, I noticed that the B-sides to the singles in the template, such as "Communication Breakdown" and "Living Loving Maid (She's Just a Woman)", are listed as singles as well, but are not included in the template. Later B-sides such as "Hot Dog" and "The Crunge" are not classified as singles with a Single Infobox either. Since you've done a great deal of work with the Zeppelin pages, what should we do about this? Should we list the B-sides as normal songs instead of singles? Or should each B-side be modified with a Single Infobox? Moviemaniacx (talk) 14:14, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will do, thanks! Moviemaniacx (talk) 12:59, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Led Zeppelin (album)

You might want to take a look at Led Zeppelin (album). User:Indopug has removed a substantial amount of your work from that article. Eyecite (talk) 03:28, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright concerns

Hi. In investigating the listed copyright problem for Hunt Armory, I noted that you seemed not quite clear on the extent to which text may duplicate a source under US copyright law. While it seems obvious that you didn't intentionally violate copyright there, the editor who noted that the material had not been altered enough was correct in advising you that changing a few words at best creates a derivative work, which remains under copyright protection. There is no clear-cut rule in the US as to how many words in a row constitute copyrighted text, which is unfortunate as it would be a lot easier to explain if there were! Any time you duplicate a run of words from a source, you need not only to cite it (which you did), but to enclose it in quotation marks. There are exceptions to this--like lists of ingredients or contents. (see this if you want more details on that.) "Apt phrase" plagiarism or copyright violation refers to the use of a part of a sentence without proper attribution (including quotation marks). The only time we may directly copy a run of words from another source is when it is truly part of general usage, and that can be very hard to identify.

There are several such "apt phrase" usages in the article as it was. "Until the Pittsburgh Civic Arena was built in 1961, the Hunt Armory was the largest auditorium in Pittsburgh and was used frequently for concerts and political events." (From the article) "Until the Civic Arena was built in 1961, it was easily the largest auditorium in Pittsburgh and was in demand for concerts and political events, many of historical significance." (from the source). While there is some revision, there is not enough without quotation marks to validate so many runs of identical text. There were also numerous cases of direct duplication in the article. Take the following two sentences as examples: "Hunt Armory was built in 1916 to house the First Battalion of the 107th Field Artillery regiment of the Pennsylvania Army National Guard." "Hunt Armory was built in 1916 to house the First Battalion of the 107th Field Artillery regiment of the Pennsylvania Army National Guard." Such duplication without quotation marks is legally prohibited. It isn't plagiarism, because there's no intellectual dishonesty there--no effort to hide your source--but it is a copyright concern, and it isn't one that we could simply address by adding quotation marks, as there are limited to Fair use allowances.

I note that there were also some concerns raised about your duplication of material from the article The London Rock and Roll Show to The London Rock and Roll Show (film). Since you removed the bot notice without addressing those concerns, I don't know if you are aware why this is problematic. Strange as it may seem, copyright material from one Wikipedia article to another can also constitute plagiarism and copyright violation. Our contributors release material under GFDL, which allows their work to be redistributed and modified in any way, commercially or otherwise, so long as they receive credit. When we merge material from one article to another—whether this involves removing it from the source or simply duplicating it—we must note the source article in edit summary so that future contributors can see who authored that material. When you established the new article, here, you inadvertently lent the appearance that you were the writer of the entire body of text, when some of it in fact seems to have been introduced by User:23skidoo, here. In addition to noting the source in the destination article, it is also necessary to make a note in edit summary at the source article in case it might inadvertently be deleted later, separating the content from its author history.

I have addressed that in these two articles. If you're aware of any other Wikipedia articles to which you may contributed content taken from other articles, please follow up there with a null edit to note the source in edit summary.

If you have any questions about copyright or GFDL concerns as apply to Wikipedia articles, please feel free to let me know. I'm not a copyright attorney, but I've spent considerable time addressing these concerns on Wikipedia and will try to answer if I can. If I can't, I'll try to find out who can. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:02, 30 June 2008 (UTC).[reply]

New Barbarians at Largo or Landover?

hello Edelmand - i'm curious about your recent edit to The New Barbarians article, since their Maryland concert is listed in most sources as having taken place at the Capital Center (not Centre) Arena in Largo MD, not Landover. i'm not an expert on Maryland geography but i gather Largo and Landover are close neighbours - have the boundaries perhaps changed since 1979, or is what "most sources say" simply inaccurate, or ... ??? thanks for any clarity you could offer. Sssoul (talk) 08:59, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your reply, and for doublechecking the venue - i trust you'll go ahead and adjust the article accordingly. very confusing of them to have two venues with almost the same name so close together! Sssoul (talk) 11:05, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for that follow-up - that makes more sense than two venues with the same name in such close proximity! and it's always pleasant when everybody's right. Sssoul (talk) 08:16, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Burn Like a Candle

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Burn Like a Candle, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:38, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rock music WikiProject

I'd like to invite you to join the newly-formed Rock music WikiProject. There's alot of Rock-related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help us get this project off the ground and a few Rock music pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks! --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 09:05, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have you seen this?

This was done because? Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 20:01, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photo on Jimmy Page's article

I can't tell you how FANTASTIC it is to finally have a decent photo of Jimmy on his article. The other one was just terrible. Thank you very much!

Happy Zeptember!

--JRomero (talk) 21:54, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Early Days and Latter Days

A user has created a duplicate article Best of Led Zeppelin, which is clearly a duplication of an existing article Early Days and Latter Days. The package has always been known as Early Days and Latter Days. I would greatly appreciate your support on the discussion at hand. MegX (talk) 23:04, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Led Zeppelin

What's your game Edelmand? The vast majority of your edits is quotes from books that focus on allegations of plagiarism and debauchery. MegX (talk) 23:36, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I get a feeling you've also been stalking my edits - The Led Zeppelin published sources for example as well as my recent edits in Peter Grant.. And the edits specifically referring to in my first comment was the "Allegations of Plagiarism" section in the main article - it now occupies a third of the entire article with the bulk of it being quotes added by you. You very rarely add anything else to the article apart for the plagiarism allegations both in the main articles and on the individual song articles as well as the debauchery claims such as the shark incident. Most books cover that in a single paragraph - you've made into a major article. As if one incident like that dominated Led Zeppelin's history, which is incorrect. On the surface you come across as a Led Zeppelin fan but when you scratch underneath a lot of the edits appear to be attacks on the band. MegX (talk) 01:15, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly my point though - the quotes have expanded twice the size a section that need only be a single paragraph. Anything else could be expanded on the song articles themselves, which is what was previously discussed on the Talk page (including removing that section altogether and merging them into the song articles themselves, which a minority of editors reverted without comment). MegX (talk) 03:20, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Addressing the specifics of the band response along with the accusations would be be better off moved to the individual song articles, rather than the main article. Two thirds is a bit much for something that involved just a handful of songs, that was resolved out of court. MegX (talk) 04:14, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Charges of assault and battery were brought against them, and they were sued $2 million". They weren't sued and they never paid out. They were charged with assault and battery but they were never sued. These are the type of edits I'me referring to. MegX (talk)

I thought so. You are stalking my edits. I just noticed you edited the Chris Welch article for the first time. You think you know a lot about Led Zeppelin but the fact you use only a limited amount of sources, and the majority of your edits are no more than adding negative quotes indicates your knowledge is shallow. MegX (talk) 01:27, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

D'yer Mak'er

Lewis said no such thing on that other song [1]. I've moved the Lewis reference up and tagged the sentence in question with a "fact" tag because I believe it to be false. That other info was added in by an editor who has long ago disapperaed after doing it. MegX (talk) 00:19, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perth Stadium

Just to let you know, plans for Perth Stadium (Stadium WA) have been scrapped. cheers, Aaroncrick^{(Tassie talk)} 06:31, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a shame the world financial crisis has happened and the stadium idea was canned. Would of been good to have a new AFL stadium. Aaroncrick^{(Tassie talk)} 05:17, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:LedZep1979.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:LedZep1979.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 23:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Knebworth79.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Knebworth79.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 23:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zeppelin68.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Zeppelin68.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 23:12, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:LedZep77.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:LedZep77.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 05:35, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tom.mevlie

Are you in any way connected with this sockpuppet account? I noticed sockpuppets of this user have been editing both articles on Led Zeppelin and indigenous Australian issues. By chance I noticed you have also been editing articles related to these as well. User:Tom.melvie has been tracked down to an Australian ISP. A-Kartoffel (talk) 00:11, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:TSRTS.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:TSRTS.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:10, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AFL Grand Final infoboxes

Hi. First of all I'd just like to commend you on your recent work on the 2009 AFL Grand Final article. I'm just wondering why you are going around changing the infoboxes in all of the AFL Grand Final articles from Template:Infobox football match to the simple Template:Infobox. You haven't left any edit summaries, so could you please do this in future explaining your actions, or at least linking to a discussion where you have explained them. Thanks, timsdad ^(talk) 11:33, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Edelmand. You have new messages at Timsdad's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Orphaned fair-use images

Hi, File:Bonzo77.JPG, File:Popewell.JPG, File:DHDedication.JPG, and File:Callahan & Scorpio.JPG are nominated for deletion. Regards Hekerui (talk) 10:34, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:JimmyPage77.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:JimmyPage77.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:57, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		I think you deserve this for your wonderful creations and contributions to Rock music-related articles. Sincerely, Scieberking (talk) 17:55, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Led Zeppelin legacy

Hi Edelmand. I've recently expanded the Legacy and influence section. I'd really appreciate if you check it out against formatting and other issues (if any). Thank you very much. Scieberking (talk) 22:31, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 02:52, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Manticore Studios

The article Manticore Studios has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A rehearsal space. Yes, it was owned by a notable group and other notable artists practiced there, but notability is not inherited and there do not seem to be any reliable sources that can be used to support this article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:46, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1969 in jazz for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article 1969 in jazz, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1915 in jazz until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bridgeplayer (talk) 15:41, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Margarete Court

You have been reverted by several people already on your additions to the Margaret Court page. Please don't add it again until discussed. It doesn't work the other way around at wikipedia. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fudged move

I want to let you know you have incorrectly moved Aborignal Land Rights in Australia. If you type "wp:move" into the search box and read about it, you will find out the little down arrow to the left of the search box contains a move command. Since you cannot now move the page because you have created a new page there instead, you will have to wait for an administrator to delete that page and then they or you will have to move the page. WP:MOVE will help and specifically WP:CPMV provides instructions for fixing it. Dont' worry about it, these things happen and thanks for contributing. - Shiftchange (talk) 10:13, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also the proper name should be Aboriginal land rights in Australia as the capitals aren't necessary. - Shiftchange (talk) 11:36, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

THanks for the instruction, won't happen again. Edelmand (talk) 11:07, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. When you recently edited 1996 AFL Grand Final, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Peter Bell and Mark Roberts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. When you recently edited Launceston Casino City, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Launceston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Woodberry

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Steve Woodberry. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:12, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Steve Woodberry

The article Steve Woodberry has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. j⚛e decker ^talk 02:25, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HOTHcover.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HOTHcover.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:24, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Edelmand. You have new messages at Talk:NBL (Australia) All NBL teams.
Message added 10:52, 24 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

As you're the most recent editor, I'm contacting you. Peridon (talk) 10:52, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Led Zeppelin and Jimmy Page

Hello! Do you want to collaborate with me and perfect the Led Zeppelin and Jimmy Page articles? Plant's Strider (talk) 18:14, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi would like to but I'm a bit busy at the moment - not too much time for Wikipedia editing. Thanks anyway though :) Edelmand (talk) 13:55, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kezar 1971.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kezar 1971.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 21:07, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Western Springs Stadium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ACDC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 17 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the WACA Ground page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:33, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Harry Guardino.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Harry Guardino.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:28, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PerthStadiumBurswood.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PerthStadiumBurswood.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:59, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PerthStadiumBurswood.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PerthStadiumBurswood.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PerthStadiumBurswood.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PerthStadiumBurswood.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:20, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2009 AFL Grand Final, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Chapman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:16, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Knebworth1979.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Knebworth1979.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. January (talk) 17:27, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gary King (bass player), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Middletown, New York. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Edelmand. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:LedZepAmerica1971.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LedZepAmerica1971.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:02, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stadium WA.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stadium WA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Edelmand. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:SubiOval8.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:SubiOval8.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 12:01, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CCI Notice

Hello, Edelmand. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:16, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Edelmand. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Coda is studio album

I totally agree with you 2 years ago in this discussion that it's post-disbandment studio album. I don't know how to put it back, without entering revert wars, but it's studio album for me, too.

Regards: The Mad Hatter (talk)

Orphaned non-free image File:LedZepSummer1970.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LedZepSummer1970.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Australasia1972.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Australasia1972.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:05, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LedZepAmericaScandinavia69.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LedZepAmericaScandinavia69.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:19, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LedZepAutumn69.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LedZepAutumn69.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LedZepEuro69.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LedZepEuro69.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:21, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Led Zeppelin's 1972–73 United Kingdom Tour.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Led Zeppelin's 1972–73 United Kingdom Tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 23:56, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]