User talk:Eddymason

Archive 1

RE:Reward Board

Hey! Thank you for helping me out with the article. It is a difficult name, so you can try searching for our parent company and some of our board members for news. Here are some links I found:

https://www.internetretailer.com/2011/06/02/systemax-subsidiary-beefs-its-canadian-web-site http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/people/person.asp?personId=340260&ticker=SYX http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/18/nyregion/systemax-rides-an-online-sales-wave.html

Let me know if this helps.

JWalk6 (talk)   — Preceding undated comment added 21:51, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Looks great. Now how do I award barnstar? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JWalk6 (talk • contribs) 18:17, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by JWalk6 (talk • contribs) 21:27, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Random question - any way to add a location/map tap to the article? Thank youJWalk6 (talk) 18:41, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

your edit at Circumcision article

I agree that this bizarre aspect of Circumcision should be mentioned within the Circumcision article. Zadly I predict that one of 5 particular editors will shortly write here telling you that they have reverted your edit as the infected and infecting mohels story is "covered" in the sub article on circumcisions within that religion. There is a concerted effort to keep a most positive tone about Circumcision within the main wikipedia article for some reason I have yet to determine.....--— ⦿⨦⨀Tumadoireacht ^Talk/_Stalk 20:37, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

We at Wikipedia love evidence-based medicine. Please cite high-quality reliable sources. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. WP:MEDHOW walks through editing step by step. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:08, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Hello, I'm Amaury. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Abortion debate— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Amaury (talk) 04:07, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:15, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm kind of puzzled on how to go about this. Recently you've done some edits that are in conflict with other edits you've done, namely that you've linked to User:Badmachine, which gives off the impression that you are Badmachine. (If you are, then you need to go through Arbcom to be unblocked since they are the only people who can do this.) You've also created an article that you said was created by a sock of Badmachine and you've vandalized Abortion debate. I'm somewhat getting the impression that your account may have been hacked or otherwise accessed by someone else, so if that's the case then I've blocked the account to keep them from continuing to make these edits under your username. What you need to do with this is to try to reset your password as soon as possible. If you've created an account with an e-mail (which it looks like you have), you can request your password be reset via e-mail if the password has been changed. If your e-mail has also been hacked and the password changed, you can try e-mailing info-enwikimedia.org to see what you can do about getting this account back. Once that's done, you can come back on here and request for this block to be lifted. I have no problems with this being lifted once all of this has been done- mostly I just want to make sure that whomever did the vandalism will not be able to access the account and make edits under your name. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:15, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've put your userpage on my watchlist, so you can reply here and/or ping me by writing {{ping|Tokyogirl79}}. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:15, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eddymason (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

OMG you're right @Tokyogirl79:, I was totally hacked. Whoever vandalized that article did so under my username. I will go now and change my password

Decline reason:

An account which has been compromised cannot be unblocked. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:00, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(signing, so the ping will work. Eddymason (talk) 19:09, 9 April 2015 (UTC) )[reply]

Note: I changed my password. ^_^ Eddymason (talk) 19:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't think accounts could be unblocked once they've been hacked, as there's no way to tell whether it's the genuine owner of the account or the hacker who's talking now and telling us the password has been changed? Squinge (talk) 19:47, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CU comment: The account hasn't been hacked, and it appears that this is indeed Badmachine. Talk page revoked. —DoRD (talk) 21:14, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]