User talk:Eddieelks

Hello, Eddieelks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited was Third Man Theatre, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. To start creating a draft article, just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit that page as you would any other. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. It is also worth noting that Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which specifically link them to one company or corporation. If your username does have such a name, it would be advisable for you to request a change of username.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! You can also just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Drm310 (talk) 15:20, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Third Man Theatre

Hello! I have done a few more edits to the Third Man Theatre article. Here's a quick summary of what I did:

Removed the phrase "award winning" from the lead section (too promotional). Perhaps a separate "Awards" section would be more appropriate.
Rewrote your references to become inline citations. You can have a look at the template {{cite web}} for help in writing those. They automatically get displayed in the References section where the {{Reflist}} tag is. Remember to only cite reliable sources. Also your Stalag Happy entry is close to citation overkill - it's better to cite one or two great sources instead of a stack of average ones.
Tagged a couple of your previous productions as needing citations. Finding sources for those would be desirable. I also removed the OffWestEnd.com link as it doesn't seem to contain any meaningful information about the Botallack O'Clock production other than "it's great".
Added some categories to your article so that it's not an orphan.
Reworked some of the section headings. There's more information about those at MOS:HEAD and WP:Section caps.

Another thing you should consider to avoid future conflict of interest warnings from other editors is to go to the article's talk page and declare your interest. In other words, reveal that you represent or have an association with the article's subject. The two main advantages of doing this are:

You will benefit from the assumption of good faith. Most editors will appreciate your honesty and try to help you.
You lay the basis for requesting help from others to post material for you, or to review material you wish to post yourself.

If you haven't already, I'd advise you to review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and familiarize yourself with the rules of editing articles you have an interest in. I think you've done a good job so far, and I've removed the conflict of interest tag from the article. Feel free to contact me again for help should you need it! --Drm310 (talk) 02:35, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Third Man Theatre concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Third Man Theatre, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 04:15, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Third Man Theatre

Hello Eddieelks. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Third Man Theatre.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Third Man Theatre}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 01:03, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Botallack O'Clock for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Botallack O'Clock is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Botallack O'Clock until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‑ iridescent 17:14, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]