User talk:Edclark
Wikipedia Help Survey
[edit]Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.
Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 17:17, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)
Remains
[edit]Yo.
I'm not seeing the advantage to adding extra verbiage to change "she was buried" to "her remains were buried"... I think most readers are pretty clear on the meaning already. If you want emphasize the point that a dead body is not the same thing as a living person, I'd rather let the reader work that out for themselves.
Just sayen. Herostratus (talk) 05:46, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
I'd rather be precise. If, when the body dies, that is the end, and there is no spiritual element leaving the dead body, THEN you can say "H was buried, or cremated, whatever. I'm an English teacher. You? Also a buddhist. Odd that you felt it necessary to reach out to me. Go away. LOL
The Signpost: 6 September 2016
[edit]
- Special report: Olympics readership depended on language
- WikiProject report: Watching Wikipedia
- Featured content: Entertainment, sport, and something else in-between
- Traffic report: From Phelps to Bolt to Reddit
- Technology report: Wikimedia mobile sites now don't load images if the user doesn't see them
Survey Invite
[edit]I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.
I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.
Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 20:58, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Edclark. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)