User talk:Edcellwarrior

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Jacob troetschel) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Bonadea 18:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Squirrel Girl has been reverted.
Your edit here to Squirrel Girl was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VugoH4YjqV4) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:18, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Crazy Frog. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. On top of calling me a vandal, a personal attack violating WP:CIVIL. TylerBurden (talk) 20:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, your continual revisions of my edits do count as vandalism, as per Wikipedia's guidelines. Please refer to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism#Types_of_vandalism; "Subtle Vandalism", which clearly states that "reverting legitimate edits with the intent of hindering the improvement of pages" is vandalism. Edcellwarrior (talk) 22:03, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you insist on continuing to edit war to insert WP:SYNTH material because a song name is that important to you, we can take the matter to the administrators and we'll see if they consider my actions vandalism. You are repeatedly violating WP:ONUS by your attempts at brute forcing your edit through despite it being explained to you that the source is not valid. TylerBurden (talk) 18:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm deeply sorry that this matter seems to be upsetting you. This is not my intent. I am merely trying to provide context that is significant to the article at hand.

First and foremost, I have provided a reliable source. I have linked directly to the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine's verified account, with the original Facebook post of the video in question. You have not explained why you feel this source is not reliable, but I will respect your wishes and provide a second source as well (see the article's talk page).

Second, you personally making multiple posts on my talk page threatening to "take the matter to the administratos" and accusing me of "brute forcing your edit through" is unnecessary. Could you please keep a more neutral tone on this subject?

I have now made a topic on the article's talk page about the current Crazy Frog page and why the sentence we are discussing should be corrected. Please read and respond to it with your thoughts. Edcellwarrior (talk) 19:51, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not upset, I just like to keep a good standard to sourcing in articles. I believe you are the one that actually reported me to the administrators, but hopefully now we are on the same page, since you found a source that actually mentions the song by name rather than it playing on a Facebook video without any sort of caption confirming it. I replied to you on the talk page. TylerBurden (talk) 22:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'm very sorry we had this misunderstanding. Also, I was not the one that reported you to the administrators. Edcellwarrior (talk) 14:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]