User talk:EdatBehringer

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Thedarxide (talk) 11:09, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation not accepted

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted.
You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Behringer.

For the Mediation Committee, Ryan Postlethwaite 01:20, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Edit warring at Behringer

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Behringer. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 00:40, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing at Behringer

Ed, your account has been indefinitely blocked because it is only being used in a disruptive manner on the Behringer article. Wikipedia articles are encyclopedia articles and thus need to be written from a neutral point of view, which means the Behringer article is not going to be a promotional article. You have been edit warring at the Behringer article and otherwise been disrupting work on the article since this account began editing, so your account has been blocked. Sarah 16:51, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The legal threats made toward other Wikipedia editors was probably not helpful either. JBsupreme (talk) 19:58, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Two words of Warning

I honestly don't know nor care about the disputes you have with other editors. But I'd like to give you two words of warning: Streisand effect. Charon X/talk 00:31, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]