User talk:Ed629

You wrote: I left a previous message, I strongly feel that the chack can be used to dupe innocent people. The image is the best I have ever seen or found online. It wouldn't take much to print it out and use it as a real check. I added void, which lets the image to be seen, but makes it difficult to use.

But that doesn't address what I said on the talk page. First, the check can't just be printed out and used. Some editing would be required because the payee is blacked out. Second, the original image has already been made public, and uploading a new image doesn't make the old one unavailable. Third, even with some convincing editing the check can't be simply printed out; it would be necessary to have the right kind of paper, the right design on the back, etc. Fourth, if a counterfeiter has the editing ability and means to create a convincing fake, I don't see how finding an image of a cashier's check is much of an obstacle. For example, we don't censor the $100 bill image because doing so would be little detriment to counterfeiters.

Anyway, I admit it's a minor point. If the image turns out to be copyrighted, the issue may become moot. Wmahan . 21:09, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Well's fargo counterfit cas.jpg

I am concerned about copyright and privacy issues relating to this image. Can you get back to me as soon as possible? --Guinnog 20:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dog

Seriously man, do you really think that the world is interested in Gomez the Chihuhua? Put this cruft on your own website please. -- RHaworth 09:37, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the above article, as it was not encyclopedic. Kukini 16:44, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Gomezthechihuahua.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Gomezthechihuahua.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:EdwardAndrews.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:EdwardAndrews.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 11:15, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:STDS9Ep426A.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:STDS9Ep426A.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:33, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Apocalypse risingA.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Apocalypse risingA.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:48, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:48, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Theship.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Theship.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:06, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Tothedeath.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tothedeath.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:00, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]