User talk:Ed!/Reviews

GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)

1. It is reasonably well written:

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable:

3. It is broad in its coverage:

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy:

5. It is stable:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:

7. Other:

Start a discussion about improving the User:Ed!/Reviews page

Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "User:Ed!/Reviews" page.

Start a discussion