User talk:Ectoplasm on Toast

Image copyright problem with Image:PresumedHunkRE5.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:PresumedHunkRE5.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 12:11, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:300px-Ps2-Terry.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:300px-Ps2-Terry.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:57, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tom green freddy got fingered 002.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tom green freddy got fingered 002.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:30, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fake Image Image:Khaled and Daughters.JPG

A tag has been placed on Image:Khaled and Daughters.JPG, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Clearly photoshopped image using copyrighted material and is fake. MasterXC 21:45, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Khaled and Daughters.JPG|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. MasterXC 21:46, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/EctoplasmOnToast for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Jaysweet (talk) 19:16, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I may have vandalized, but I am no sock puppet. Ma1kel was not even blocked yet at the time I made my edits. EctoplasmOnToast (talk) 23:50, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to YouTube, you will be blocked from editing. Jaysweet (talk) 19:18, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 1 month from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

_GB^T/C 19:25, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]