User talk:Ecobun
William Herbert Wallace
[edit]I proposed undoing some deletions and possible vandalism to William Herbert Wallace, namely NPOVing it generally and reinstating changes prior to revision 159617289.
Ecobun 19:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Status:
keeping added NPOV in para 2donereinstating headersdones/her/their/ againdonereinstate "officially unsolved"donerestoration and linkification of JG book referencedonerefactoring of RW 1980 referencedoneunsure: naming of the principal alternative suspect (who apparently died in ~1981)done: with refactored references and Popular Culture section, given that the finger was pointed only in print and in a TV series, and not by the Police.
Ecobun 18:25, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Re: Cleanup thanks, delete wars on William Herbert Wallace?
[edit]No problem! :) I looked a bit at the vandalism, and we got 3 options: either we restrict editing from the whole BT network, or we disable anonymous editing on the article for a short while, or we moan and revert the unwise fool. To be honest I don't think the 2 first solutions are a good idea (the first one because it affects thousands of innocent people, and the second one because the idiot isn't comming often enough for a short block to be effective). That leaves us option 3 (as usual, might I add). I added the page on my watchlist so I'll keep half an eye on the article, but if you catch the user red handed (i.e. less than a few hours after the vandalism), leave a note on WP:AIV explaining the situation and an admin will probably block the IP for 24 hours. Usually vandals are less persistent than us and get bored before we are :). -- lucasbfr talk 23:11, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Richard Gordon Parry
[edit]Hi, I can't really comment in the article without breaking WP:NOR etc. Why don't you come over to YoLiverpool where there is a good discussion about the case, and in particular, my theory. RodCrosby (talk) 21:51, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
shout out to you
[edit]We shouted out to you for your quick work here in my new It Gets Better video. I hope you approve.--Mike Selinker (talk) 23:22, 6 April 2012 (UTC)