User talk:Ecneislop
Ecneislop (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am just shocked how is it possible to edit several days in wikipedia and not get accused of somehting terrible. I saw that I was blocked by user:husond and first time I thought it was because of few IMAGES that I uploaded that did not have a right copyright, but than I saw that he/she accuses me of sockpuppetry. I have nothing to do with that and I am not anyones sock. I reverted some of the husonds edits that I think were CONTRADICTING the info and data provided on the other pages and I believe thats exactly why I was blocked. I understand some of you here are LONGER than me and I also understand that everyone wants their edits to be FINAL but how can you block someone for that ? I think it is totally unfair and I will appeal the block by all possible means as provided in the guidlines of wikipedia: appealing the block. I regret that this even happened and I hope that someone impartial will take care of this. thank you
Decline reason:
Do you take us for total idiots? You are blatantly a sockpuppet of Polscience. Go away. — Yamla (talk) 14:49, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Oops! Your recent edit removed the {notability} tag from this article before the question of whether or not this hotel meets the notability criteria had been fully answered. I restored it for you; once someone has added the required multiple, independent, reliable sources, it'll be time to take the tag off. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:38, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Re: Marilyn Monroe Image You Uploaded
[edit]Hello, I added some info to the regards of the Marilyn Monroe image you uploaded to the Marilyn Monroe page ( you spelled Marilyn wrong) and I just realized that Wiki editor Delicious Carbuncle nominated it almost instantly for speedy deletion. I have checked all sources available and cannot find any copyright claims on this particular photograph. It is just very strange to me that Delicious Carbuncle is following my edits like a stalker. Delicious Carbuncle accuses people all the time of sock puppetry and actions committed by others in bad faith when I am editing only in good faith. Delicious Carbuncle recently accused me of sock puppetry with another Wikipedia editor which turned out to be a false claim and accusation. You can see on the talk page of Delicious Carbuncle that this person loves to delete more than to help. If you are new to Wikipedia, Ecneislop, welcome. You are not supposed to delete notifications, even if they are from a spirit that is obviously controlling others like Delicious Carbuncle has been doing it for quite some time now. Good luck. --Weareallone (talk) 03:45, 25 March 2008 (UTC) Marilyn Monroe Image You Uploaded
I saw that and that is why I said 'Welcome' to you. I am far from being knowledgeable in the editing section. Admitting this is the first step to receive help from others. I work too much to get into the Wikipedia addiction, but as you see below, there are also friendly Wiki members who at first seem contra and then shift and become helpful. I am not sure if some people like Delicious Carbuncle can block you from uploading anything. Possibly so, if you could not do it again. My feeling is that Delicious Carbuncle thought that you were me and that is why you are blocked, but that is just my assumption and theory. If Delicious Carbuncle does follow my edits again that obviously, I will file a report for Wiki Stalking. I did not upload your image I just corrected your spelling. My personal comment to Delicious Carbuncle, and I mean that in a deeply positive way: 'Get A Life!' And you please don't get intimidated just because some self proclaimed Wikipedia Police inpector turned stalker us scaring you off. The beauty of Wikipedia is in my opinion the interactive action, the information and the educational aspect. This is the future and this is where the books will be left behind. There was an article last week in the New York Times on this topic. Just hang in there. --Weareallone (talk) 05:38, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
