User talk:Ecko1o1
Welcome to my lovely talk page.
August 2010
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to World War II, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. The revision in question: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=World_War_II&oldid=377420782 — UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 07:43, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to World War II. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Revision in question: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=World_War_II&oldid=377420782 — UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 07:44, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia
[edit]Pakistani's don't have any right to use Wikipedia ??? why you are asking me that i am using an English Wikipedia ! Can you please elaborate...
Nabil rais2008 (talk) 15:35, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
No i don't spend my time by editing on Pakistani version of wikipedia, because my areas of interest are skyscraper related articles, Dubai related articles, Mega projects, and developmental projects on fairly large scale, i tend to create articles on these subjects only, and you may know that there are very little skyscrapers in Pakistan nor there is any development on massive scale like the ones in Dubai.So that's why i do so.Hope you got my point.
Nabil rais2008 (talk) 15:39, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
World War II article
[edit]Hello, I've just reverted your edit as it seems to be your personal opinion. Could you please explain your rationale on the talk page? (providing references to support it). Thanks, Nick-D (talk) 07:45, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Race
[edit] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Race (classification of humans), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. The Ogre (talk) 09:12, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi there Ecko. Just letting you know, in case you haven't realised, I reverted your edit to Katie Piper the other day, as I do not think his being black is relevant, and certainly not necessary in the lede section. I also took a quick look through your edits and noticed that race-related edits seem to be rather popular in there, so I thought I should just warn you that some of them appear to be border-line racism. Also you seem to often leave messages on user's talk pages which could be seen as offensive, and then immediately qualify them with a follow up message, although sometimes evenm that doesn't seem to be adequate. So I would also like to warn you to make sure you are careful not to offend when interacting with other users. Cheers, - Kingpin13 (talk) 17:05, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- If you can actually find his nationality I suppose it might be worth noting in the article, but simply stating that he is black doesn't really cut it for me. - Kingpin13 (talk) 18:53, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:35, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
If you remove the image again without a good reason, I will block you for vandalism. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 15:13, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for sharing. Have you thought about seeing a therapist? — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 19:02, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
ANI notice
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Rude and racist behavior. Thank you. Elockid (Talk) 02:27, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
October 2010
[edit]
{{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JodyB talk 02:52, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Ecko1o1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is a good joke, looks like thegreyanomaly had been spying on me all this time, looking for any excuse to get me another block. I didn't say anything racist. I said a picture was ugly, not because of its content but because of the two ugly people in it. So simply because it was of interracial nature all of a sudden I'm racist? As for my comments on Asian American about Tiger Woods not being Asian you would find most Asians agree with me. A person of mixed Asian ancestry can claim to be Asian, but in no way can he be representative of an entire Asian ethnic group. How could Tiger Woods represent Thai people? He hardly looks anything like a Thai person, and most Americans probably don't even know he is part Asian. Most importantly he does not claim to be Asian. Oh but because I point this out, I'm racist? Give me a break. Also, I never claimed that other Asians like South Asians or Southeast Asians were not Asian, after all they are part of the Asian "continent" but culturally East Asia and South Asia share few links, racially, linguistically or culturally. So it's a fallacy to claim that Asian can be seen as a racial term, if the definition of Asian encompasses all of these peoples. I was simply pointing that out. Oh but no, all of a sudden that's my racism and superiority complex isn't it? Haha. Anyhow, it's ridiculous that the posts of a real Asian are deleted or blocked while hordes of non Asians can represent us in any way they see fit. Systemic bias much? You people are not East asian, yet you believe you have some right to portray and insult us as you wish. Thegreyanomaly thinks east asians are descendants of indians for heaven's sake. You people like to select my comments to show how "racist" I am, this is the most basic disinformation technique in the propaganda guide book
Decline reason:
White worship? Degraded Asian society? I've seen the diffs from the ANI report and that satisfies me that you don't warrant unblocking yet. S.G.(GH) ping! 08:55, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- (edit conflict)I have increased the block to indefinite, based on your unblock request. It's clear that your attitude in editing Wikipedia is fundamentally unacceptable and incompatible with the encyclopedia's purpose.
- Another administrator might theoretically accept the unblock request, so I am going to leave it up. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 08:56, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.