User talk:Eckinc

Welcome!

Hello, Eckinc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page American Gladiators (2008 TV series) do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TheChrisD ^{Rants•Edits} 10:16, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To TheChrisD: I was providing a constructive edit. You have misspelled the Gladiator's name and have continuously reverted my edit to the incorrect spelling. "Panther" is a client of mine and the proper spelling of her name is: Corinne van Ryck de Groot. Furthermore, I provided a link to Corinne's official website, not as an advertisement or for a boost in search engine ranking, but as an additional source of information (photos, videos, etc.) for fans trying to learn more about Ms. van Ryck de Groot. I believe my addition was highly constructive and appropriate. In this instance, you are wrong. Eckinc (talk) 20:53, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the website does exist (the first time I browsed it, it was offline, hence my first revert) - however, the website link does not belong in the Gladiators table. It is sufficient enough in the External Links heading.

Also, I don't completely believe your claim that you are her "consultants" and she is your "client". Would you like to post some proof of that, before you start claiming it in several places? TheChrisD ^{Rants•Edits} 21:43, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you wouldn't believe me. My company, www.ECKinc.com, has been providing e-Business consulting to Hollywood celebrities and businesses since '99. Nevertheless, if you're still doubtful, please revisit www.SexyPanther.com or www.CorinneDeGroot.com next week. We will by finalizing the implementation of our e-Business Solution v3.0, allowing visitors to purchase Ms. van Ryck de Groot's photographs and custom designed "Sexy Panther" and "KO Panther" clothing. Eckinc (talk) 07:55, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

unblock-spamun|WadeEck|I had one (1) article questioned for review regarding my company, MMA H.E.A.T. I participated in the review process, was educated about Wikipedia's preferred practices and then withdrew my appeal. I see no reason why my account should otherwise be blocked. I ask that it be unblocked and if it makes the administrators happy, use WadeEck as my user name. I'm not trying to hide anything. It is funny though, for wanting a reliable and trustworthy encyclopedic source, most of you administrators hide behind fictious user names. Eckinc (talk) 22:27, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Karyn Bryant 1324.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Karyn Bryant 1324.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --aktsu ^(t / c) 02:28, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To Aktsu : A letter of permission has been sent to permissions-enwikimedia.org from Ms. Bryant using her official domain, KarynBryant.com. Furthermore, Ms. Bryant confirmed us as being her sole authorized agent on Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if you would quit questioning our work. Eckinc (talk) 09:10, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Who is this "us" and "our work"? This account claims at one point to be a single person, and at others talks in plurals, leaving the editors of Wikipedia like myself suspecting that this is in fact a corporate/collective account, not just a single person with an unfortunate choice of username. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:01, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redacting

To redact/take back statements we usually just ~~strike-through the text~~ instead of deleting. Don't worry about it though. I also wanted to respond to some of your posts on various talk-pages: 1) Thank you for at least being transparent about your associations; you didn't have to but you did, which is appreciated. 2) Your username should probably be changed per the WP:ORGNAME policy, but I don't think there's any rush hence why I didn't report you for immediate blocking until it's changed (which I could) as I though I'd just create unnecessary drama. 3) Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are alway welcome, and speaking only for myself especially in the area of MMA. With your access I'm sure you could contribute a lot of useful material (thinking mainly of images which there's alway a need for, though the same goes for good writers), and if that's your aim know your are more than welcome. But, 4) I can only call it like I see it, and for the time I've seen you edit it has only been around areas of which you have a clear conflict of interest. While you say you only want to provide accurate and factual content, and admittedly I've seen far worse in terms of what people might add, it's still (at best) strongly discouraged and I hope you see why people might have problems with it? After the article was deleted you've vigorously lobbied to have the deletion overturned, calling it blatantly improper on the ground of, basically, how awesome you think the site is. Have you stopped to think you are maybe not the best person to judge this? I can see why you would want to promote your site, but when people are telling you "you're doing it wrong" it might be a good idea to take a step back and realize they maybe right. If I've been unfriendly and/or unwelcoming I apologize, but if you haven't guessed it already I don't particularly like people seemingly promoting themselves on a website which is supposed to be a free encyclopedia with actual encyclopedic content, not somewhere people can create articles on themselves to make themselves seem bigger and more important than they really are, which to be complete honest is what you seem to think it is. Cheers, --aktsu ^(t / c) 02:54, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I can no longer refer to the original article, but I can state with confidence that it was not written in a promotional manner. It merely stated facts. It listed the officers of the company, the goal of the company and content that has been covered. Very few if any adjectives were used. The last few days have definitely been a learning experience regarding Wikipedia rules, regulations and guidelines. Today MMA H.E.A.T. premiered it's new 1/2 hour show; we're already receiving great feedback. I have no doubt that someone will eventually rewrite the MMA H.E.A.T. article, eliminating the conflict of interest problem. Since you have an interest in MMA, perhaps you'll even write it one day. That would be fun. Take care. All the best. Eckinc (talk) 04:50, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. You have violated one or more of our rules, including rules against adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, using Wikipedia for promotion, and editing inappropriately with a conflict of interest. This kind of activity is considered spamming and is forbidden by Wikipedia's policies. Although Wikipedia has a great many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, it is considered inappropriate for such groups to use Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not. See Wikipedia:FAQ/Organization for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest for the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, or organization. If this does not fit in with your goals here, you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

What can I do now?

You are still welcome to write about something other than your company or organization. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} below this message box.
Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

See also Wikipedia:Appealing a block for more information.

--Orange Mike | Talk 19:16, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Eckinc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

OxMonkey (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Decline reason:

Please follow all instructions above. — Sandstein 06:08, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:MMA HEAT.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MMA HEAT.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:23, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Karyn Bryant 1324.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Karyn Bryant 1324.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:19, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Movies, For Guys Who Like Movies

The article Movies, For Guys Who Like Movies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable TV show. No reliable, independent sources in the article, and none found on Google.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 22:31, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]