User talk:Ebrikowski
)
Hi! I just wondered if you were aware that there is a standard for what should appear in school articles? Your edits at Hillsborough High School (Tampa, Florida) indicate that you must not. The title to this section is a wikilink to them. You should probably familiarize yourself with them. I will be cleaning up that article here in the next few days and I would appreciate you not shoving all the unwanted content back into it. If you want to tout the school on the internet, there are numerous places you can get a webpage for little to no cost. Wikipedia is not the place for it. Thanks! Gtwfan52 (talk) 06:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Lol!
... don't you mean scrubbing" the article?!!!! .... standard? .... like recording, ... "who, what, how, why, and when?" .... clearly there is no regard for that .... as, you have taken it upon yourself, ... to be judge, jury, and executioner ... "scrubbing" ... names and events. and sources, that are and were of some historical significance, not only related to an institution of learning, but also, to the community, and the city, and county in which it is situated.. ... being the first public institution of higher learning in that city and county, and one of the oldest in the state, not to mention, the center of an entire historic district that is "Seminole Heights". there is "a lengthy history" that cannot be ignored, and the same institution was also the birthplace of one community college and one private university, the history of that particular institution is intertwined with the history and evolution of the entire county, as well as the progress of the state, as one of it's earliest institutions. ..... I guess in your mind, ... you would weigh a canary and a rhino and call them equal in weight? ... or try to insert a years financial records and tax receipts for Bank of America into a 1040EZ form~!? Good luck with that!
... "cleaning"?, .. would have been refining the language, shortening or editing the content to make it more concise, even rearranging it in a manner to reduce the amount of space it consumes on a page... even update expired links, or ferret out more recent links, that coincide with keeping the information, up to date and accurate.
... so to say, that "George Washington chopped down a cherry tree!" would be unwanted content, and/or braggartry? ... well, with that lofty standard and due to the editorial diligence of egoistic altruists such as yourself, I imagine it won't long before , "Wiki", will be the web sight of zoetropes! ... pretty pictures spinning around in a circle! .... It is no wonder the consensus is that Wiki ... will never be .. what it once had the potential to be, ... "at least a semi-reliable source" for fact based content! ... "a folksy encyclopedia Americana".
... it is clear, to me now, ... that Wikipedia is fast becoming nothing more, than a "scrub" or "spin" sight for "Tea Baggers", "libertarians", the NRA, and other corporate and political interests to use and modify, to their benefit, ... and for those, who have way more time on their hands, ... probably mostly due to being "unemployable", .. to try and rewrite history, spin historical events. and scrub political and conservative biographies, and scrub "rivaling" articles, ... all to suit their narrow, skewed "Puritanical" or myopic view of the world!
."Wiki" is fast becoming a complete waste of people's time, especially for those who are interested in contributing factual and interesting pertinent material to better the Wikipedia experience.... and/or who are in search of .. or wish to contribute, source based, ... accurate, factual, and/or even more in depth content, than can be otherwise extracted from an everyday children's encyclopedia, or an "Ask.com" search ... for the sake of posterity. ... so, what is "Wiki", anyway? ... other than "a circle jerk!"
If you are going to maliciously blanket delete "sourced content" I have contributed, to an article, then DELETE IT ALL!!! ... don't "chicken shit out" and "half ass" delete some of "the names and content" randomly, just to assert your AB ... passive aggressive traits! ... all of the individual names and content had "equally earned mention" .... if you don't believe half of them don't belong in the article, .... then, none of them belong in the article! DELETE THEM!!!!
..... What in the hell good is only posting ... "half of the names and facts ??? . THAT IS HALF ASSED!!!!!! ... and, just to appease your guilt, no doubt! ... JUST DELETE EVERYTHING I HAVE CONTRIBUTED!!!! THEN, DO YOUR OWN HOMEWORK!!!!
I am done with this SHIT! ... I have better things to do with my time, than to see interesting, "folksy", historical material, that I have rediscovered or discovered, ... material that would otherwise be considered of interesting, or local historical, or social importance, then shared to, ... "contributed", to "Wiki", only to be discarded ... by ass holes, out of ignorance, arrogance, or sheer spite, ... it doesn't matter which, I AM DONE WITH THIS CRAP! AND, I AM DONE WITH YOU!
June 2013
[edit]
Hello, I'm Gtwfan52. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Hillsborough High School (Tampa, Florida) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Gtwfan52 (talk) 07:20, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
July 2015
[edit] Your recent edit to Hillsborough High School (Tampa, Florida) appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 21:49, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Ebrikowski. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Norman Reeves
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Norman Reeves requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ★Gooseflesh12★ (talk) 18:45, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Norman Reeves for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Norman Reeves is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norman Reeves until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ★Gooseflesh12★ (talk) 19:56, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
The article Guy Toph Award has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Notability not demonstrated
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – The Grid (talk) 03:05, 15 March 2023 (UTC)