User talk:Ebacherdom
Archives
[edit]- User talk:ebacherdom/Archive 1: June 2005-August 2006
Discussions
[edit]Summary of the past events involving Fabricationary:
- For the record, the original claim by Fabricationary, that removing a person from the November 25 page was 'vandalism' was unneccessarily provocative and not strictly true. Efforts to remove information a person believes to be non-notable are not vandalism, even if it turns out that a consensus of editors disagrees. Only intentional efforts to damage the encyclopedia are considered 'vandalism' on Wikipedia... efforts to improve it, even if mistaken, are not. That being said, this was a minor instance of incivility... and predicated on a viewpoint which is unfortunately very common. However, even if it were a more severe breach of Wikiquette that would in no way lessen the impropriety of the response. Just don't do that. While prior warning was not directly given (though such behaviour is specifically barred in Wikipedia's policies... and direct warning was given more or less concurrently) it should not need to be for attacks like that. I think Ebacherdom has made predominantly positive contributions to date and will likely continue to do so in the future. Alot of people have difficulty dealing with conflict / opposition online and hopefully this will be a one time thing. --CBD 22:41, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Notes
[edit]Thanks for your notes. I'm glad I was able to help. Good luck and see you around. --CBD 12:19, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Image:Berninigrave.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]
I looked into this and I see that this item WAS mistakenly uploaded. I uploaded images that day for both bernini's grave and the colesseum Geocaching article. Please speedily delete this image, and thanks for catching this error. Ebacherdom 11:04, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Cupel, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 16:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Shor International
[edit]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
A tag has been placed on Shor International requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Malcolma (talk) 10:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
"Elephant ear (doughnut)" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Elephant ear (doughnut). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 5#Elephant ear (doughnut) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Smartyllama (talk) 18:11, 5 June 2020 (UTC)