User talk:Ebabau

Dear Ebabau: I am not one of the official reviewers, but I am a fairly experienced Wikipediia editor. Isee that your article about G. Philip Stephenson is nearing the top of the list of articles for review, and I thought that I would give you some tips on how to make sure that your article will be accepted.

First of all, every Wikipedia article, and especially one about a living person, must have citations and independent references to verify the facts in the article. Independent means not written by or by direction of you or Mr. Stephenson. You have one such good reference, and I have made it into a citation for you so that you can see which facts the reference supports.

Some of the other references are not really independent, but there are plenty that you could use. Here's an example that I found on the web:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/15/AR2005081501483.html

Also, the section about Mr. Stephenson's hobbies is not very encyclopedic. Only notable happenings or accomplishments should be in the encyclopedia, not thoughts and feelings. If any of Mr. Stephensons's sailing or environmental activities were reported in the news, or something like that, then they would be appropriate.

I hope this helps. I can see that a lot of work has been put into this article, but I fear that it will not be accepted without more documentation. —Anne Delong (talk) 06:08, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/G. Philip Stephenson.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! BO | Talk 15:38, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/G. Philip Stephenson.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! RadioFan (talk) 23:13, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/G. Philip Stephenson concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/G. Philip Stephenson, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:13, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: G. Philip Stephenson has been accepted

G. Philip Stephenson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

RadioFan (talk) 04:00, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of G. Philip Stephenson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article G. Philip Stephenson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Philip Stephenson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Edwardx (talk) 20:10, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edward, you mentioned this: "Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources, either those in the article or elsewhere online." A google search for Philip Stephenson would produce independent coverage results.

There is another Philip Stephenson on Wikipedia, which is an entry for a contemporary baseball player, hence the differentiator was needed by adding the "G." initial.

There are several articles linked on the Wikipedia page from reputable, independent sources, such as the Washington Post, the New York Times, the Financial Times, etc., as well as links to prestigious organizations, such as National Geographic Society and Ocean Exploration Trust where the subject serves as a board member, advisor, and/or donor.

Many other philanthropists have wikipedia pages (i.e. Ted Waitt, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Waitt; Michael Bloomberg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Bloomberg and many others). This one too is factual, accurate and sourced according to guidelines. When it first accepted the entry several years ago, Wikipedia said this: "This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people."

Should you feel that more or different links and sources need to be included please suggest appropriate edits or additions that you as an independent Wiki editor see as necessary. Deleting the page serves no purpose as it does not violate any terms of use. Would you please consider withdrawing your Afd? Thank you. Ebabau (talk) 20:59, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Ebabau. All of this will be evaluated during the course of at least one week. One thing that does concern me is that you appear to have a conflict of interest. The only articles that you have been involved with are G. Philip Stephenson and Petit Saint Vincent, an island of which Stephenson is the majority owner. Can I suggest that you read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, and consider making a declaration? I have left a message below accordingly. Edwardx (talk) 11:18, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Edwardx. I see and appreciate your suggestions and the keen interest you have in this topic. I am not affiliated with the Petit Saint Vincent resort and have no input in promoting it. I am, however, involved in nonprofit marine conservation work, namely coral restoration and marine protected areas in the Eastern Caribbean. As such, the perceived COI you mention is rather cause-related and not determined by a particular place or person. All the information in the entry is factual, sourced from reputable publications, neutral and not intended to promote any particular subject, and meets Wikipedia's core content policies WP:COPO and WP:CCPOL of Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV) Verifiability (WP:V) and No original research (WP:NOR). To avoid any appearance of impropriety, I will follow your advice and include a "connected contributor" disclosure to the article, since my core interest and connection to the topic is related to nonprofit environmental conservation work. Ebabau (talk) 17:18, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Edwardx. Following your advice and the guidelines you kindly shared, I added this declaration to the page in question: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:G._Philip_Stephenson#Connected_Contributor_COI_declaration Hopefully, this clarifies the connection and satisfies the question. Please let me know if you have any other suggestions and thank you once again for your keen interest. I am not as well versed as you are on Wikipedia editing, nor do I have the time to allocate to being an editor. Most of my time is spent underwater and working with NGOs and local communities to try to save and restore what is still possible to save of our degrading marine environment. Cheers Ebabau (talk) 17:59, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Ebabau. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page G. Philip Stephenson, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Edwardx (talk) 11:16, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]