User talk:EatenRiper
Appearance
Re: Alleged
[edit]"when these are used, ensure that the source of the accusation is clear." I think its redundant at best in the Ricky Kasso article; that sentence states that there was muchpublic concern" without commenting on its validity. Graham87 08:51, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- It implies that there are effects to be concerned about EatenRiper (talk) 09:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Raggedy Ann doll (September 29)
[edit] Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abelmoschus Esculentus was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raggedy Ann doll and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Raggedy Ann doll, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, EatenRiper!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —AE (talk • contributions) 10:13, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
|