User talk:EatPay3

April 2021

Please stop adding colorized photos on John Wayne. I've reverted all the changes. You need to patiently join the discussion on the talk page, which I started. Via WP:BRD, it would be considered disruptive if you continue to add the colorized photos as they are considered contentious. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 09:55, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you have added that image colorizer link, I see why the quality of the colorizations is so low. Adding that link isn't appropriate in that article because it has no relevance to John Wayne. Second, an instant web service is not the same as a professional colorization, which should only be used in unusual circumstances, not to wholesale change an article. You continue to add these images after being told about BRD and after it is obvious they are contentious. This is considered disruptive and if you continue, can lead to sanctions. Just so you know. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 10:08, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@EatPay3: You must discuss your proposed changes at Talk:John Wayne#Colorized photos. It is very unlikely that a proposal to colorize the images at John Wayne would be successful because such colorization is original research as there is no evidence regarding what colors should be used. Also, it is not needed. At any rate, edit warring is not permitted. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse. Johnuniq (talk) 10:29, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at John Wayne, you may be blocked from editing. Do NOT edit war on articles. If you've been reverted, then take it to the talk page. (see: WP:BRD). — Ched (talk) 15:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC) — Ched (talk) 15:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EatPay3, please don't continue this. I don't know if you are new to Wikipedia, but this is a collaborative joint and you've been reverted by two editors now, with another, also an admin, saying it provides "a false picture". You can try to make your case on the talk page, but if you simply ignore all these messages and continue this kind of editing, you will be blocked, I'm afraid. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:18, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert yourself

It is clear that your changes are not wanted by anyone but you. If you don't revert your edits, you force me to request a block for edit warring. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 21:30, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi EatPay3! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

It looks like nobody welcomed you here, sorry about that. I reverted your changes, again, because you really need to listen to all the great voices who explained things to you above. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:58, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You must gain consensus at Talk: John Wayne for the changes you want to make. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 22:15, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:POWERFUL 245 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/POWERFUL 245. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:57, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]