User talk:Easytostable

Welcome

Hello, Easytostable, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:49, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your WP:G11 speedy deletion nominations

Hi, I have declined a number of your WP:G11 speedy deletion nominations. G11 is only for pages that are "exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to serve as encyclopaedia articles, rather than advertisements". It is not a general catch-all for things like "Not at all notable" or "Not meeting Wikipedia's guidelines". The speedy deletion criteria are deliberately very strict, so please be careful to only nominate articles if they unambiguously satisfy the criteria. For deletion nominations outside of the WP:CSD criteria, please use WP:PROD or WP:AFD. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:48, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To respond to your message on my talk page (it's easier to keep a discussion all in one place), asking me to tag the articles. I didn't see any clear speedy deletion criteria under which they would fall, so my only recommendation is that you do not do any speedy deletion tagging. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:59, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. B.R. Sur Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital and Research Centre

I have reverted your close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. B.R. Sur Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital and Research Centre. As a major contributor to the article, you should not be the one to close the discussion, so please leave it to an uninvolved person. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:53, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have also reinstated the WP:AFD notification that you removed from the article - again, that should only be removed by an uninvolved closer. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:56, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot once again Easytostable (talk) 09:57, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. There are so many policies and guidelines here that it's impossible to understand them all. I also saw that nobody gave you a welcome message when you first registered, so I've rectified that with the welcome message at the top of this page - it contains some very useful links for finding your way around. And if there are any general things you don't understand, the WP:Teahouse is a helpful place to ask. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:05, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And yes, certainly, you're welcome to ask at my talk page if you need any help. (I won't always be around, and I might not know the answer, but I should hopefully be able to point you in the right direction.) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:13, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You were warned above not to close AfDs in which you are involved, as you have chosen to do so again at Community Based Medical College, Bangladesh, I have been left with no alternative to blocking you. This is an indefinite block, but can be lifted if/when you show you understand the issues with your behaviour. The guide to appealing this block can be found at this link. Nick (talk) 12:50, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please Unblock me I thought that it was community consensus Easytostable (talk) 12:51, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my contribution Easytostable (talk) 12:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Easytostable (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please Unblock me I was blocked for just closing the Afd because already there were many keep,If this was my mistake I am sorry for It it won't happen In future , admin please see my contribution as I am a Constructive editorEasytostable (talk) 12:56, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No grounds to unblock you until you fully answer Nick's question, below. Yamla (talk) 13:30, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have never tried disruptive editing thanksEasytostable (talk) 12:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You were told by Boing, above, not to close AfDs where you are involved. I do not understand how you could make this mistake, again. I would prefer a considerably more detailed explanation of your error and what you understand about what you can and cannot do in relation to articles where you're a major contributor, and what you can and cannot do in relation to discussions where you've already participated and expressed an opinion. Nick (talk) 13:00, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have understood my mistake now that uninvolved User can close sorry nick I am really sorry Easytostable (talk) 13:02, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider my request Easytostable (talk) 13:02, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

−

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Easytostable (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please Unblock me I was blocked for just closing the Afd because already there were many keep,If this was my mistake I am sorry for It it won't happen In future , admin please see my contribution as I am a Constructive editor I have understood that I should not close Afd where I am the major contributor, also I am Promising that I will not appear to behave in that manner Easytostable (talk) 13:45, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed to Mariyaibrahim (talk · contribs) and The cool mew (talk · contribs). I was pretty conservative in blocking accounts on this IP range, too – I wouldn't be surprised if more of them were also related to you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please consider my requestEasytostable (talk) 16:22, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]