We can talk here?

Why was my Edit blocked?

I cant ask a question about policy because my edits keep getting blocked. This regards an edit on Impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump Why am I getting this message on my talk page. It isn't a biography. "An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially violating our policy on biographies of living people, so it has been disallowed. Disruptive editing may result in a block from editing."--Eastview2018 (talk) 16:07, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Detroit Will Breath

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Detroit Will Breathe a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Detroit Will Breathe. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. —¿philoserf? (talk) 16:41, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

also commented here Draft talk:Detroit Will Breathe —¿philoserf? (talk) 20:00, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

requested the fix here: Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests —¿philoserf? (talk) 20:18, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Detroit Will Breathe

Hello, Eastview2018. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Detroit Will Breathe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!--Eastview2018 (talk) 16:04, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James R. Randlett

The article James R. Randlett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non local politician. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. duffbeerforme (talk) 06:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Detroit Will Breathe

Hello, Eastview2018. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Detroit Will Breathe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:07, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You`re welcome. --Eastview2018 (talk) 17:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How many of the candidates may I vote for? Eastview2018 (talk) 14:46, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Please note that this topic area is under a extended-confirmed restriction, meaning that only editors with the extended confirmed permission are permitted to make edits related to the conflict anywhere on Wikipedia except to make properly formatted edit requests on article talk pages. You will obtain this permission automatically after you have made 500 edits and your account has been open for thirty days.

Thank you for your cooperation.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 20:50, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]