User talk:Easily ruined

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Easily ruined (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please point to where any one of my accounts have been used abusively. I have genuine reasons for using multiple accounts. Why were these not asked for? Why was a CheckUser performed in private without leaving a log? Please point to any vandalism. Please point to a single edit that is against your policy. Please point to an edit that wasn't productive.

Decline reason:

Checkuser-confirmed abuser of multiple accounts. User should request unblocking from ArbCom or post a correct request at User talk:ColouredSpots. TN X Man 18:41, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Creating an illusion of support No
Circumventing policies or sanctions No
Avoiding scrutiny Second opinion requested See also legitimate uses
"Good hand" and "bad hand" accounts No
Role accounts No
Deceptively seeking positions of community trust No
Administrators with multiple accounts No
Posing as a neutral commentator No
Voting more than once in polls No
Misusing new pages patrol No
Strawman socks No
Editing logged out in order to mislead No

I smell a bad block. Easily ruined (talk) 17:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]