User talk:Earlymorningcans

St John's Jerusalem

Can I thank you for your recent edits to St John's Jerusalem, it certainly makes a start to undoing the vandalism the page has sustained over the last month. Grand High Most Supreme Hochmeister of Wikipedia and the Universe (including Ireland and Wales) 16:46, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --RA (talk) 18:55, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You're trolling, and I don't know whose sock you are, but it's someone. Blocked indef. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:33, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Earlymorningcans (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There is an outstanding (but unfounded) allegation of sock puppetry against me here. The principles of natural justice dictate that that accusation should be resolved before unilateral action can taken against me by a single administrator, without any prior notice. The notion that I am somebody's "sock", accompanied by an admission by the blocking administrator that he cannot even suggest a name, is troublesome. Moreover, an accusation of "trolling" has been made, but no evidence has been provided to support it, and no warnings were given in relation to particular edits. In fact, the edits I have made to St John's Jerusalem for example, have actually helped to repair that article from the parlous state to which previous hoaxers and vandals had reduced it. I object to the unilateral nature and speed of this block and desire to continue editing Wikipedia. Earlymorningcans (talk) 21:43, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Confirmed by CheckUser as a sock puppet of Stellas4lunch (talk · contribs); talk page editing privileges revoked. –MuZemike 21:50, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.