User talk:Eaomatrix


Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #165

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Eaomatrix, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Kzrulzuall ^{Talk• Contribs} 10:18, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I got the wrong person Arnon Chaffin 15:08, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What? Arnon Chaffin 13:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Barnstar

Thanks so much! That's my first ever or second ever, depends if you count random smiley awards. Anyways, thanks! Evilclown93 16:45, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For reverting the vandalism to my user page. Regards LittleOldMe 15:50, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Request

Hello, as an admin will you do me a favour and indef block my bot account User:EMBot, until I rewrite the programming and properly build it, so it can't cause any harm in the mean time. Please remember to disable the autoblocker. Eaomatrix 18:05, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. (aeropagitica) 18:08, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. Eaomatrix 18:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Close?

How Close??..hehe..--Cometstyles 03:14, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

do they accuse u of vandilisng too?

The one in bold wasnt added by me..Check your talk history..Cheers..--Cometstyles 15:42, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

well i saw on a page once that u said that u didn't vandilise anything and they wrote to u saying that u did. and u said somthing about ur computer making that happen and i was sayin that they didi that 2 me 2! r u a boy or girl?

Thanks for fixing my user page

Moved to userpage with thanks! :)

SAFC peer review

I've added some comments, please let me know if I can help you out further in this endeavour! Cheers for now. The Rambling Man 20:40, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So I seen, I will be sure to start work on the article with some assistance :). Eaomatrix 20:43, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SAFC / S.A.F.C.

I was just wondering if you had seen this Discussion at WikiProject Football regarding the abbreviations SAFC and S.A.F.C.. The consensus was that SAFC should be a disambiguation page, not a redirect, because it is not exclusive to Sunderland AFC. Thanks. --Jameboy 21:43, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just added S.A.F.C. above as I noticed you'd made that a redirect to Sunderland A.F.C. too. Please can we discuss? Thanks. --Jameboy 17:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alphawiki

Without some indication of the procedures that this group would follow, I am virtually certain that it would be deleted almost immediately. For people to actively join, it would need more clearly specified goals (specific ways to improve articles, etc.), and specific procedures to bring about those goals. John Carter 21:13, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would still need some specific procedures in place, or at least hints of same, for their to be anything for the "Project" to do. John Carter 21:31, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In response to the message you gave me, you really don't need a project in order to spearhead Wikipedia pride. Work on articles, stay constantly civil, and you will have done your job. —Signed, your friendly neighborhood MessedRocker. 15:17, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, creation of (too many) procedures will probably sink a project faster than anything else. ;-)

Heya Eaomatrix, I saw that you wanted to make a replacement for Esperanza. That's exactly what I was hoping you'd say! Good luck and have fun! Beware of the bureaucrats who constantly gnaw at our sanity, and who ultimately killed Esperanza.

Have a great day!

--Kim Bruning 18:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Give it a rest

Stay off my talk page from now on, unless you actually have anything valuable to say about my edits to the various pages of wikipedia, so to paraphrase, keep your tartish comments off of my talk page.

King nothing 15:44, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: WoW

Fixed all. If I am not mistake, normal page moved over redirects can be done by even non-admins. Something you can keep in mind next time. Thanks for the note on my talk. - Aksi_great (talk) 13:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All writers are notable?

With all due respect, doesn't an author still have to meet the criteria of WP:BIO? Wildthing61476 16:07, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But they are notable to some point. Try AFD instead. Eaomatrix 16:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In fact they are not - the "Creative professionals" section on WP:BIO tells us the criteria to which authors are to be held. If an article is created on an author who has only publised one or two books in a vanity press, then it is likely to be deleted on the grounds of insufficient notability. Thanks, Martinp23 21:38, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Attention

I have emailed you, please read immediatly.The Sunshine Man 18:23, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block

I've blocked you for a month. Vandalism is not clever, nor is trolling. Wikipedia is not the place for these sort of games. Thank you. Moreschi ^Talk 10:27, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lengthen block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eaomatrix (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please actually put my block to indefinite. I' am not using this account anymore anyway. Plus I am not responisble for the Retiono Virginian incident. Eaomatrix 10:27, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

We don't typically block upon request, and especially not when the user has been disruptive. I'm not seeing any indication that you are remorseful, or that you are even acknowledging very damning Checkuser evidence. Would you care to explain your actions? – Riana_ऋ 10:40, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sorry about the vandalisim, My buddy keeps getting ahold of my computer when I get up. Guess i'll just have to carry it around with me wont I!! well, hay, have a good one

A new beginning

Re your message: Do not waste your time writing a message to me. I am no longer in support of Wikipedia and have joined the ranks of those who oppose it. --ElectricEye (talk) 15:01, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Satellite 5

The article Satellite 5 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 23:16, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]