User talk:Eagles247/Archive 10

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Eagles247. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archive 8

→

NFL infoboxes

We are still changing the NFLretired to NFLactive, Right? Just making sure becuase Kurt Warner's page was changed to retired and I changed it back to active. Southwood Paul (talk) 02:02, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Yep, we still are. When in doubt, just check the "To Do List" at WT:NFL. BTW, welcome back! Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:39, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

A quick question about this: when things are changed, are there plans to rename the template? I ask since right now the name is dead wrong. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 21:45, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

I'd hope so, but this process could take a long time to complete. Unless we had a bot to do it... Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:50, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

For reverting the vandalism on my userpage.--Yankees10 23:11, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

No problem. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:31, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Copyrighted image File:File:Alwoods.jpg

Good catch on the copyrighted image. First, I went to lsusports.net to verify the image is from there.[1] Then I had to double-check the tagging options, since the image is on Commons and not Wikipedia proper. The tag is {{Copyvio|source=URL that shows violation}}; if you don't have a link, parameter 1 is the explanation for why it's a copyvio. So, it's tagged, and I'm waiting for a Commons admin to delete it. —C.Fred (talk) 19:27, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

		The Userpage Shield
		A token of appreciation for repeated rescues of my user talk. Thanks, Eagles. Tiderolls 04:18, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:05, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Your memorable moments..

are hysterical. I kinda feel bad. lol Tommy²⁰¹⁰ 15:49, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Haha, thanks. Who do you feel bad for, me or the vandals? Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:05, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Well I feel bad their article got deleted, but I'm sure it was for a good reason, especially if he responded sarcastically. The other thing for you being uncivil, obviously is dubious I think! I've gotten death threats once. It was quite remarkable. Tommy²⁰¹⁰ 19:11, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

I've gotten much worse than what's in that section. Never death threats, but close. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:16, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Don't you love it? My friends in real life are like what? How do you get threats on Wikipedia? ... don't ask. haha Tommy²⁰¹⁰ 19:22, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Haha, yep. No one will ever understand the life of a Wikipedia editor. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:27, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your input Tommy2010 17:05, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

No problem. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:10, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Ken Parrish

Sorry about not providing a source but there really is no source but i know for a fact because i have had him for a substitute teacher and my dad is friends with him and we know that he didnt work on the police force and he was a substitute teacher i don't think that eagles.com has there facts straight i know that he is still listed on the stroud regional police force but they don't update their site often they still have an officer who died about year ago up on the site and eagles.com says that he is still listed on the stroud regional police force site so how about instead of fighting about whos right or wrong why dont we just say on his page that it is unclear about wheather or not he worked as a substitute teacher or a police officer

Jhardyrules9 02:10, 15 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhardyrules9 (talk • contribs)

I have found a source that says both http://www.poconorecord.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100504/NEWS/100509953/-1/NEWS18 Jhardyrules9 02:17, 15 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhardyrules9 (talk • contribs)

No need to i already did —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhardyrules9 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

User talk:45g

Please see WP:BLANKING. If they want to blank their page, there is no reason for you to restore the content. --Onorem ♠Dil 21:50, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing me to the appropriate policy. I've seen other users do what I did, so just I assumed that it was correct. Sorry for the trouble. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:21, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Multiple question post

1) Do you think Donovan McNabb is a Hall of Fame quarterback? By the end of his career, I feel like he will amass more than 45,000 passing yards, 300 touchdowns, and less than 150 interceptions with a Super Bowl for the Redskins. He will retire as the most honored black quarterback in the history of comptitive, organized professional football.

2) Can you please make my warning a block? I have vandalized over 50 Wikipedia pages in the past month. I have learned nothing from vandalizing. It only encourages me to do it more.

- Jacoby Ellsbury

Mrm087 (talk) 01:05, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

No self-requested blocks. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:08, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Tag

I don't believe that Stu duval is considered G10. It was not an attack page. I believe that tags such as those, and hoaxes tend to drive away newcomers, that may make more constructive edits down the road.. Thanks CrimsonBlue (talk) 20:54, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

From WP:G10: "These "attack pages" may include slander, legal threats, or biographical material about a living person that is entirely negative in tone and unsourced." (emphasis added) The article didn't seem positive at all to me. If you'd like, I can change it to A7, but it won't make much of a difference. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:57, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

I don't think that A7 is needed, but something like G2. Thus you Assuming good faith in the hopes that the editor was only making a test, and plans to contribute constructively one day. Just an observation CrimsonBlue (talk) 21:03, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Ah, I see what you mean now. I've gone ahead and switched the tag from G10 to G2, and switched the notifications. Thanks, Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:08, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

You Falsely Deleted My Article

You considered it vandalism when I was simply updating the information, which was valod amd had several sources. Why would you delete a good article? Are you trying to disrupt the peace of wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Astronomer433 (talk • contribs) 03:25, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

First off, you didn't create an article. Second, if you are referring to your edit to Vince Wilfork, yes that is considered vandalism. Please review WP:VANDALISM and a guide to creating your first article for advice on improving Wikipedia. Thanks, Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:29, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Re:Memorial pages

WP is a memorial. That is what it is. It is a big graveyard on the Hudson. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lowellmassachusetts (talk • contribs) 22:19, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

U.P.I. article. September 1986. Syndicated worldwide. Doug Hall interviewed. Read all about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lowellmassachusetts (talk • contribs) 22:53, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Who do I contact?

In regards to getting my older accounts deleted.202.93.213.34 (talk) 01:48, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

You can't delete accounts. See this. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:52, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

IP is also a blocked sock. —fetch ·comms 01:56, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, I was aware. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:58, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Treb Queron wiki page

Impersonation was not my intent/motive for creation of the page, and this username was purely chosen off the top of my head so I could create the page. The page was created with the intent to provide information on this person so that people may know about them, as I'm sure many people are wondering who he is. If you find any incorrect information and know a correction that should be made to it please feel free to edit it with the correct information. Trebqueron (talk) 05:41, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Okay. Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)