User talk:Eaglehawkii

September 2023

Hello, I'm DrowssapSMM. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Luminiferous aether have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. DrowssapSMM (talk) 18:06, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Would you care to specify to what you objected? Eaglehawkii (talk) 18:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

used wrong template, it just needed to be sourced. DrowssapSMM (talk) 22:59, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback. I will source the entry ASAP. I'm a newbie on Wiki. If you have tips, let me know.

I'll try to learn how to properly source my entry. Too often the public thinks "scientists always change their minds". They don't typically appreciate that a change in theory doesn't usually invalidate all previous knowledge from the outdated theory. Eaglehawkii (talk) 23:54, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i would recommend reading Wikipedia:RS, WP:V, and WP:NOR. these are core policies on article sourcing that everyone needs to know. DrowssapSMM (talk) 00:20, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can document every aspect of my post. Accurate history is highly constructive. Eaglehawkii (talk) 18:57, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]