User talk:E Wing/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:E Wing. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
U5
Hi E Wing. Thanks for taking the time to tag inappropriate pages for deletion. However, you've been a bit... over-zealous in some areas, and so I'd like to ask you to slow down a bit with the deletion tagging and consider whether the encyclopedia is really being improved by your actions.
You've tagged a large number of userpages using the new U5 criterion. This criterion specifically permits anything which is allowed under WP:UPYES, which would include things like quotations and mottos ("A small and proportionate amount of suitable unrelated material"), editing tests ("Experimentation") and short autobiographies ("Limited autobiographical content"). It's designed to allow easy removal of blatantly unsuitable userspace pages like games, fake Big Brother simulations (you'd be surprised how popular those are), blogging and forum hosting, not to allow the systematic deletion of any userpage that doesn't mention Wikipedia itself within the first three line. Please try to be a little more circumspect in using this criterion - since it's relatively new, not everyone is familiar with it yet. Consider the perspective of the first-time user who joins Wikipedia, sees that they can (and in fact, are encouraged to) create a userpage, and pops their favourite quote in there as a placeholder, only to get a message two minutes later saying that they've broken the rules and now their page is being deleted. Would you want to stick around in that sort of environment?
I certainly don't want to knock your excellent work elsewhere in the CSD field, but I think with this particular criterion, you should probably rein yourself in a bit. Cheers, Yunshui 雲水 08:34, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: User:Protocrat
Hello E Wing. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Protocrat, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not WP:NOTWEBHOST, just a short userpage. Thank you. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:38, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
ALYB
Dear E Wing,
I do not understand why the ALYB entry is being suggested for "speedy deletion" do to presumed usage of the space as "advertising". My understanding of the rules is that I, the owner of ALYB, cannot post information on the Trademarked brand because I have a relationship to it. However, I'm stuck in the middle in that I do not want the page taken or used in a manner contradictory to what it is so I've tried to "reserve" it. My only sentence is similar to the wikipedia page for "FUBU" which is also a brand and states it's acronym defined. Would you please tell me what I CAN enter on the page to give information for those seeking it without it looking like "advertising" to you?
Thank you, Aaron — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.133.239.100 (talk) 03:16, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- No need for that, the speedy deletion has been declined. And I believe you can post information on that brand even you have relationship to it, but it must be neutral. Cheers. E Wing (talk) 03:31, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: User:The Jews of Nantasket Beach/sandbox
Hello E Wing. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:The Jews of Nantasket Beach/sandbox, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 01:11, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: User:Pivot3/sandbox
Hello E Wing. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Pivot3/sandbox, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 01:12, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion - User:Veale Wasbrough Vizards/draft
Hello E Wing,
Veale Wasbrough Vizards/draft was recently marked for 'speedy deletion' due to being 'blatant advertising'. I was quite shocked by this as I had used other solicitors wiki pages as a template, such as DAC beachcroft. I wasn't quite finished adding in references but thought that would be OK as still in the draft stages, but I have taken some information from the webiste - so maybe that is why it was advertising? I am still new to adding articles so any assistance/tips would be great.
Many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.100.221.66 (talk) 10:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
RFA Nomination
Howdy, I would like to nominate you for Adminship. There has been a significant divide in the admin requirements and I feel that you may be more than suitable for the Mop. If you would like to accept this nomination, please let me know so I can complete the process. Nakon 06:10, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Quixotic plea
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 05:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Deletion
Please I Will like to get more information as to why my page is under speedy deletion. It was stated that advert materials are on the page so please if you point them out I will gladly remove them I love wiki and I want to continue using wiki
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.175.150.127 (talk) 08:26, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
- What page is it? E Wing (talk) 09:19, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
A brownie for you!
|
Delete like you did my User talk page, but more mouth and less click. Call me Dimitri (talk) 03:59, 11 June 2016 (UTC) |
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, E Wing. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
- Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
- Editor-focused central editing dashboard
- "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
- Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
- Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!
 | Just a happy birthday message to you, E Wing, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Lepricavark (talk) 05:15, 22 January 2017 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, E Wing. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)