User talk:EVOShadow032

May 2021

Hello, I'm DanCherek. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Republican efforts to restrict voting following the 2020 presidential election, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DanCherek (talk) 12:20, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Republican efforts to restrict voting following the 2020 presidential election. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. –Novem Linguae (talk) 12:28, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EVOShadow032, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi EVOShadow032! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to United States presidential pets have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: United States presidential pets was changed by EVOShadow032 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963406 on 2021-06-03T16:40:53+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:40, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Theodore Roosevelt have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Theodore Roosevelt was changed by EVOShadow032 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.923381 on 2021-06-14T13:16:12+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:16, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Voter suppression in the United States, you may be blocked from editing. Please read this also as a warning against adding content without providing a reliable source. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 17:37, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination. – bradv🍁 04:55, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alerts

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Firefangledfeathers (talk) 20:55, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at COVID-19 pandemic in Michigan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TomCat4680 (talk) 19:13, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at COVID-19 pandemic in Michigan, you may be blocked from editing. TomCat4680 (talk) 19:13, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Chris (talk) 19:18, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]