Jump to content

User talk:EUPintern

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2010

[edit]

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Crusio (talk) 14:07, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, EUPintern, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

Please choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. However, do not create a new account if you wish to credit your existing contributions to a new name through a username change. To request a username change:

  1. Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to edit this talk page even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
  2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
  3. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a list of names that have already been taken. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.
If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 15:53, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Modernist Cultures has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article on a journal that has not yet even published its first issue. Article creation premature, cannot yet be notable. Does not meet WP:Notability (academic journals) or WP:N.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 17:25, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Status and Advice

[edit]

Some of your new journals are notable, but one that is not yet published cannot possibly be. I'd like to help you do this right, and so would my colleague abocve--we both work extensively with this sort of article. but you should be more careful about not trying to put in articles that will not hold, following our username policy, and giving the necessary information: Based on what is generally accepted here, an article about a journal should also contain:

  1. Fulll titles, earlier titles used, and the corresponding dates. Make cross references from any variant titles.
  2. Standard abbreviations used--make redirects from them.
  3. publishing & sponsoring body, as well as earlier publishers & sponsors
  4. availability on line
  5. no. of articles published a year
  6. ISSNs for both print and online versions
  7. Online availability of current and earlier issues
  8. Open access availability, if relevant.
  9. Circulation (sourced somewhere--default place to get it is Ulrichs)
  10. coverage in major standard indexes, inclding particularly Scopus and Web of Science (Science Citation Index) if covered--even some humanities titles are
  11. latest year's impact factor if available, and rank in the JCR subject field(s). Include the year so it can be updated.
  12. any actual references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases.
  13. a list of the 3 or 4 most influential articles similarly, getting citation figures from Web of Science
  14. External links to the journal's main web site, and , if relevant, the main website of the sponsoring body.

It should not contain

  1. General information listing all the fields covered, unless it is not obvious from the title
  2. Statements of praise for the journal -- see WP:PEACOCK
  3. A list of those on the editorial board
  4. names of the staff, except editors in chief; subordinate or section editors should not usually be listed.
  5. Information about subscription prices
  6. Information about how to submit articles
  7. Links to the publisher's general website, or to subpages within the journal's site.
  8. and, most important, it must contain no text from the web page description of the journal. That is a copyright violation, and needs to be rewritten. Even if you are prepared to donate copyright according to WP:DCM, it is likely to be unsuitably promotional.

Please read our FAQ about organisations, and articles like this, and for more specific information our Wikipedia:WikiProject Academic Journals/Writing guide. As it specifies there, the best way to start is by using the infobox journal template; but also convert the information there to prose. I'll be g;ad to help, if you contact me at my talk page. DGG ( talk ) 18:00, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Katherine Mansfield Studies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only 1 issue published, not yet notable. Article creation premature, does not meet WP:Notability (academic journals) or WP:N.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 13:20, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]