User talk:ESMcL

Hi ESMcL, I noticed that you'd redirected your user page to a different title. In case you would like to change your user name, please use the process described here. Redirecting your user page doesn't in fact change your user name, your contributions are still signed by your current name and the user you've redirected the page to could be registered by somebody else. Thank you! --bonadea contributions talk 08:12, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:MacGuire College Beacon Foundation.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:MacGuire College Beacon Foundation.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 15:16, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Tom-O'Toole--The-Baker.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tom-O'Toole--The-Baker.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 19:50, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Tom-O'Toole-and-Family.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tom-O'Toole-and-Family.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 20:16, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also the following images:

—Bkell (talk) 20:16, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:MotiveNewLogo.GIF listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MotiveNewLogo.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 20:19, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Beechworth Bakery

The article Beechworth Bakery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

None of the sources provide any indication of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mean as custard (talk) 19:03, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So...

So you're clearly Tom O'Toole right? Clearly, yeah? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.229.38.184 (talk) 13:15, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Beechworth Bakery

Hi. I have restored the Beechworth Bakery article. I cannot guarantee that it will not be suggested for deletion again. If you are still active on Wikipedia and would like to help to improve the article, please do. What it needs most is more information cited to sources that are independent of the bakery and founder. Wikipedia values "secondary sources" higher, as it means that someone else thought the topic was worth writing about. --Scott Davis ^Talk 12:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]