User talk:ERIKnoUniverso

Welcome!

Hello, ERIKnoUniverso, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 02:46, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Shineyourlight.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Shineyourlight.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 02:46, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Asuka Sato moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Asuka Sato, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 16:01, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Ikuivesound.png

Thanks for uploading File:Ikuivesound.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 16:45, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello ERIKnoUniverso. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:ERIKnoUniverso. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ERIKnoUniverso|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 16:55, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Praxidicae. I'm not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits. I'm just an I've Sound fan who wants to fill information about the group, their artists and their new releases. I began editing and creating some articles, however, it was missing references. Then I put some references from their official website, and other sources like labels they have worked for or the I've Sound Explorer non-official website, until I was told was not giving enough references or just primary references. Then I tried to find more sources, and while I understand I shouldn't put sources like Youtube, TuneCore, Spotify or any other commercial stuff, sometimes it's just getting difficult to find so many different sources to validate. Even so, I managed to find some non-commercial japanese websites stating the veracity of the informations, but now, I got accused of promoting. I mean, I don't know what Wikipedia administrators want from me. I got them sources, and secondary sources, and it's ok if something isn't going well, but when someone erases an whole article or an whole edit (or the worse: erases a whole true information that I DIDN'T make, just because I worked on something else on the page) about an artist, claiming that it's not relevant for Wikipedia I don't know what to do anymore. What is relevant? How does the administrator knows what is relevant or not? When? What's the measure? What is the criterion for taking something and punctually saying "this is relevant" and "this is not"? I mean, I created an artist page, then an administrator erased it, because he think it's not relevant. Why? Wikipedia has artists articles. If it's prohibited to create articles like this, so all the other pages should be erased now. But if it's not prohibited, then who is this person to say that a information is not relevant? Maybe for him/her/them, it's not, but again, it's opinion and I've got the Asuka Sato page erased because of a opinion, not a rule! I got so stressed with all this mess that I gave up, because I simply can't fill information and sources without getting the whole work being erased right after. ERIKnoUniverso (talk) 00:35, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Wikipedia can be frustrating. It might be less frustrating if you started with the assumption that some topics simple are not notable enough to justify a Wikipedia article about them. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, it's not a directory, and it's not a place for information about all topics. (You might find WP:NOT to be interesting.)

So, a rule of thumb - if it's very difficult to find reliable sources about a topic, don't try to create an article about that topic. For example, if a band releases an album, there might be very few, if any independent articles and stories about that album, in what Wikipedia calls "reliable sources", because, let's face it, there are tens (hundreds?) of thousands of albums released every year, and magazines and newspapers and websites have only so much space (or paid writers, in the case of a website). So it could well be pointless to try to create a separate Wikipedia article about a new album - all that is going to happen is that the article is going to be deleted for lack of good sources.

Editors are not supposed to judge whether an article is relevant. Instead, the judgement is about sources. For example, a news article that mentions something briefly would be acceptable to document a fact in an article, but does not establish notability. Notability is established when there are a number of articles (again, in reliable sources, not at fan sites, or press releases, or similar) that focus on the topic of the Wikipedia article. So, for example, a list of "top 100 albums of the month" might be from a reliable source, but that list is useful only to document the existence of an album - it doesn't support, in any way, that the album is notable enough to deserve a separate Wikipedia article. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 17:39, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Asuka Sato

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Asuka Sato requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 17:01, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Laboratory(cover).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Laboratory(cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shineyourlight.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shineyourlight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rina (singer)

The article Rina (singer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO – no indication of notability, only sourced to official websites of the artist/record company, social media and online stores... no independent reliable sources found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richard3120 (talk) 20:34, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Awake from the deep

The article Awake from the deep has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSONG – no indication of notability, only sourced to official websites of the artist/record company and online stores... no independent reliable sources found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richard3120 (talk) 20:35, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Prismatica(cover).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Prismatica(cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:46, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Awakefromthedeep(cover).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Awakefromthedeep(cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:27, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]