User talk:EPeterson1985
Welcome!
[edit]Hi EPeterson1985! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 19:05, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
December 2021
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to DeliverFund, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources.
Also, NY Post is generally considered unreliable so should not be used (see WP:NYPOST), especially for potentially defamatory content which generally requires multiple reliable sources. S0091 (talk) 19:28, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi EPeterson1985, I removed the material you are trying to add to the article, initially because of WP:BLPCRIME but now I see Michael Goguen does have an article. The accusations are already covered the article about him so there is no need to repeat it in the DeliverFund article. Please do not continue to add the content as it will be viewed as disruptive. S0091 (talk) 20:02, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
January 2022
[edit]
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to DeliverFund. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions.
Please follow the blue links and read the policies as these are non-negotiable. You need published reliable sources that specifically state they made false claims and specifically what those false claims are. If no such sources exist, the material cannot be added to the article. If you continue to add the content without the appropriate sources, you may ultimately be blocked. If you have questions or need help, you can ask at the Teahouse. S0091 (talk) 23:37, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
February 2022
[edit] Hi EPeterson1985! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war.
Please also see the sock puppetry policy which also covers meat puppetry. It appears you may be abusing multiple accounts or coordinating with others which is blockable as is edit warring. As stated before, if you have reliable sources that explicitly state DeliverFund has made false claims, you need to provide them. Otherwise, you (or anyone) should not add that claim to the article. You are welcome to start a discussion on article's talk page and I will join you there but be sure to provide sources.. S0091 (talk) 00:10, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- Actually I went ahead and started a discussion on the article's talk page so please respond there. S0091 (talk) 01:03, 20 February 2022 (UTC)