User talk:EOB7902

WP:SYNTHESIS

Hi there, these edits [1][2] constitute WP:SYNTHESIS. You are using two different sources that say different things and drawing a conclusion that is not expressly stated in any of the references. For that reason, the content is being reverted again. Also, per WP:BRD, when you are reverted, your next step is to open a discussion on the article's talk page to seek consensus. Resubmitting the same disputed content without discussion is disruptive and can be ground for having your account blocked. See WP:CONSENSUS. Also, there's no need to editorialize, as you appear to be doing here and here and here. Changing "generally negative reviews" to "panned" is subjective fluff and doesn't belong in articles since it is not consistent with WP:NPOV. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:51, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Transformers: Age of Extinction. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Diff: [3] "Panned" is a subjective and pointed determination. Your conclusion should be directly attributable to a reliable source, or you can opt to avoid the summary, which is a valid way to go. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:55, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Cyphoidbomb. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Diff: [4] Your comment "shut up" is not consistent with WP:CIVIL. Wikipedia is a community projecte. If you're not willing to adhere to established protocols for editing film articles, or other guidelines, you will very likely wind up blocked. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:30, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Though I appreciate your apology here, I will continue to message you as long as your edits are inconsistent with normal editing guidelines. That means the control is entirely yours. If you stop adding improper summaries of critical response, then there's no need for me, or for other editors to comment. These summaries you keep adding are best avoided, since the aggregators are not always in alignment. the WikiProject Film community has on numerous occasions opted to avoid them entirely, for example at Mad Max: Fury Road, Jurassic World, etc. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:54, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See also Special:Contributions/2601:404:8000:8166:FD38:3633:756E:CFF1, among numerous others. - SummerPhD^v2.0 02:50, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Cyphoidbomb, you may be blocked from editing. MarnetteD|Talk 03:12, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for block evasion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Darkwind (talk) 03:12, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]