User talk:ELENAMPAL

Ways to improve Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences

Hi, I'm Lemonmelonsuperstar. ELENAMPAL, thanks for creating Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please write boldly.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. LEMONMELON 15:53, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note

By writing boldly I mean you must write with a bigger font size and follow the style(copy editing) of Wikipedia.Cite ref. properly.Please check other Wikipedia articles.Please check the guide for beginners.Your article was deleted by Jimfbleak because of advertising or promoting the article(rule:G11).Please contact Jimbleak for more info about why he deleted the page.When you write something on a talk page,you must sign your post.Lemonmelonsuperstar (talk) 08:20, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. First, some technical stuff unrelated to deletion. You tried to put references in-line, but the correct way to do it is to put <ref>[url description]</ref> where you want the reference to go in the text. The [url description] bit is so you can describe the reference rather than just have a bare url. After the "References" heading, just put {{reflist}} which will generate the list.

I deleted your article because

it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: highest scientific and ethical standards... served as a pole of attraction of many scientists in Greece... developed various international collaborations... managed to publish important articles... Its main advantages are reliability... international recognition is stamped with the attendance at the outdoor... — and so on for the rest of the article, it's an uncritical rave review
it's all about what the organisation claims to do, little about the organisation itself. No location or offices, although I'd guess from the text that it's in Greece somewhere. How does it meet the notability guidelines? We have no idea who the members are, how it's funded, or how many employees. For all we are told it could be three scientists speaking on the phone occasionally, with no offices, staff or money.
The article was created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. Thank you for declaring your interest. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

If you like, I can sandbox the deleted text for you to improve Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:05, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]